User talk:Hari singh

From SikhiWiki
Revision as of 03:03, 15 February 2011 by Hpt lucky (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Please Note: To add a message, please click on Edit tab1.JPG at the top of the page. This will give you a blank page - Add a brief title at Subject/headline: line and your main message in the body. Sign off by clicking on the Signature icon.jpg on top of the message box. Then just save the page in the normal way.





Archived Files

Active Users as at 20 April 2008

messages

A story for the news section

http://english.aljazeera.net/video/americas/2011/01/2011147534895984.html

Thought this might be of general interest to all. Raab Rakha, Hari Singhtalk 10:47, 4 January 2011 (EST)

Please Use English

O Unique, Receptive and Relentless Penpal^^^^^ Khalsa Hari Singh Nirvair, Gurbani's Idol, Steadfast and Self Realized through Gurbani's Grace Dear Jpuji Sahib Ji !! Gur Khalsa Ftyh!

  • Hukm rzaii chllxa nank likhiaa naal
  • Sb ty uttm gur shbd viichaar

Subject Hukam (USE ENGLISH ONLY) has been noted for strict and demonstrative compliance in future. --Keerat 23:02, 5 January 2011 (EST)

Neutral Responses

Sir this is bad problem in all wiki sites. They have to throw truth away for neutral responses. This is symbol of scary from falsehood. The Truth is written very much below in article and false is written above it. So this what we say achayi par burai ka dabaw.

well ya we should live with equality we should love all we should not say False = False, because this could hurt anyone and GUru Sahib says do not hurt anyone, if truth hurts then no problem speak lie or make truth neutral.

(Lucky 05:58, 12 January 2011 (EST))

Height of Selfishness of Sikhiwiki

In Sri Chand Article, few lines from guru granth sahib was added about Sri Chand which are removed by some people.

On one side sikhiwiki wants neutrality in articles on other side they want content which they like and removing that content shows a big manmatis are also in the way, who could kick guru granth sahib for any other thing. If this website is for few people to amend, or slave to some organization's belief, then it is bad source for correct inormation. What do you think?? kindly talk with organization about this (Lucky 04:03, 15 February 2011 (EST))