Talk:Vegetarianism Other Views: Difference between revisions
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Yhis not the page for giving rebuttles on vegetarianism and Sikhism. There is a whole page dedicated to vegetarianism and Sikhsm....is that not rebuttle enough? Or are not other views allowed here? --[[User:Incredible|Incredible]] 01:30, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | Yhis not the page for giving rebuttles on vegetarianism and Sikhism. There is a whole page dedicated to vegetarianism and Sikhsm....is that not rebuttle enough? Or are not other views allowed here? --[[User:Incredible|Incredible]] 01:30, 27 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
==Initiating & Sustaining A CNTRVRSY(sic! can't spell)is the very ROOT of FALSEHOOD== | ==Initiating & Sustaining A CNTRVRSY(sic! can't spell)is the very ROOT of [http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php?title=FALSEHOOD#SOCIO-_POLITICAL_HYPOCRISY_.26_SHADY_DEALS FALSEHOOD]== | ||
"..The topic of meat eating is a controversial one...???" | "..The topic of meat eating is a controversial one...???" | ||
--Sayth HANAK '''NOOOOOOOO!''' IT IS '''NOT''' A TOPIC to BEGIN WITH...Mass Mass Kar...'' | --Sayth HANAK '''NOOOOOOOO!''' IT IS '''NOT''' A TOPIC to BEGIN WITH...Mass Mass Kar...'' | ||
[[User:Mutia]] 27 Sep 06 | [[User:Mutia]] 27 Sep 06 | ||
==RECOMMENDED that ...== | ==RECOMMENDED that ...== | ||
* TRUE IDEA(satgur) of handling rebuttals be the Talk/Discussion page of any Article. | * TRUE IDEA(satgur) of handling rebuttals be the Talk/Discussion page of any Article. | ||
[[User:Mutia]] 27 Sep 06 | [[User:Mutia]] 27 Sep 06 | ||
Revision as of 12:15, 27 September 2006
This Page need cleaning up. I may be able to assist.
Cleaning up
This page needs to be properly presented otherwise it will be deleted.
- You start with a wrong translation and then argue the matter. The translation for the Shabad on page 1377 does include "fish" – see here. So this is not the correct starting point for the argument. Please make sure you start with the correct translation. --Hari Singh 09:31, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
* Nobody is saying it does not include fish, but the point being argued is that machalee = fish and NOT flesh. A subtle but very important point.--Incredible 16:18, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
Also can we keep the rebuttle's to the vegetarian page. This is an alternative or other view. Rebuttles are not appropriate here. --Incredible 16:43, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
Vegetarianism Other Views NOT Vegetarianism and Rebuttles
Yhis not the page for giving rebuttles on vegetarianism and Sikhism. There is a whole page dedicated to vegetarianism and Sikhsm....is that not rebuttle enough? Or are not other views allowed here? --Incredible 01:30, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
Initiating & Sustaining A CNTRVRSY(sic! can't spell)is the very ROOT of FALSEHOOD
"..The topic of meat eating is a controversial one...???" --Sayth HANAK NOOOOOOOO! IT IS NOT A TOPIC to BEGIN WITH...Mass Mass Kar...
User:Mutia 27 Sep 06
RECOMMENDED that ...
- TRUE IDEA(satgur) of handling rebuttals be the Talk/Discussion page of any Article.
User:Mutia 27 Sep 06
