User talk:One: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Confusion: new section)
Line 69: Line 69:
== Confusion ==
== Confusion ==


"One", your added sentence appears as gibberish. The font you are using is defaulting to a meaningless scramble of letters and numerals. Niether appering as Gurmukhi or roman letters that make any sense (the quote on Guru Nakak's words.
"One", your added sentence appears as gibberish. The font you are using is defaulting to a meaningless scramble of letters and numerals. Niether appering as Gurmukhi or roman letters that make any sense (the quote on Guru Nakak's words. Generally the font used for Gurmukhi defaults to  just rows of question marks.


the english translation below (.......There is no end to ......!!!!! Do not try to arrive at it or define it. what are the ......(periods for? did Guru Nanak include these?  [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 18:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC))
the english translation below it. is unclear as well(.......There is no end to ......!!!!! Do not try to arrive at it or define it. what are the ......(periods for? did Guru Nanak include these?  [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 18:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC))
 
There is no end to creation? Do not try to reach the end, or even to find it?????

Revision as of 12:38, 6 September 2008

Khalsa

I have reverted the changes on this article as they do not live up to the standards now expected at SikhiWiki. Any changes must improve the standard that we have already achieved and not drop those standards.

The text from the article is copied below:

"Khalsa which means 'Truthfull & Pure' is the name initially given by Nanakto Sikhs. The term used by him for it however was 'Sachiaara'from SatGurBani Language (and Punjabi as well, which is live & green even Today) Language.

10th Nanak Guru Gobind Singh , about 200 years thereafter used the popular word Khalsa (a synonimous of Nanak's 'Sachiara') of his time to popularise it in martial terms under chaotic war torn environment.

The socio-political 'Order of Khalsa' was thus initiated by Nanak (to be more precise by Kabeer)10th Nanak has expresssed his gratitudes to Kabeer in his following words

  • "Kabeer Panth ab Baio Khalsa..."

In an eminent GurMat Scholar's Words....

  • " Steel of the Sowrd, which Guru Gobind wielded, was provided by Nanak.." (can well be read Kabeer )

The order of Khalsa (Sachiara) was formalised by 10th Nanank. He initiated a formal socio Martial protocol of baptising his Sikhs taking Amrit in a ceremony called Amrit Sanchar. The first time that this ceremony took place was on Baisakhi, which fell on 30 March 1699 at Anandpur Sahib in India. The Sikhs celebrated the 300th anniversary of the day in 1999 with thousands of religious gatherings all over the world.

The word "Khalsa" is derived from Arabic khalis (literally meaning "pure" or "unsullied") and Perso-Arabic khalisah (literally pure; office of revenue department; lands directly under government management), is used collectively for the community of baptised Sikhs. Theologically Khalsa encompasses all Human beings ( irrespective of Their cast, class, creed, faith, race, social / regional denominations) & superior creatures living elsewhere in universe. The term khalisah was used during the Muslim rule in India for crownlands administered directly by the king without the mediation of jagirdars or mansabdars."

So as to help you understand the reasons for reverting the article, I have given some details of my reasons:

  • 1. Too many Typos: truthfull - should be truthful; Nanakto Sikhs should be Nanak to Sikhs; 'Sachiaara'from SatGurBani should be 'Sachiaara' from SatGurBani; Nanank - should be Nanak; Steel of the Sowrd should be Sword, etc
  • 2 Changes not accurate or supported by Gurbani: Guru Nanak did not use the word "Khalsa" - Bhagat Kabeer did! No quotation of Guru Nanak given to support the statement made.
  • 3 Does not significantly enhance or add to the article.

I am sorry to have intervened in this manner, but I hope you will agree that to present Sikhi in the best light is a commitment for all of us.

I suggest that if you wish to make any major changes of this nature to an existing article, that you first present those changes on the talk page so we can all agree them before they are transferred to the article page. This will save time and be more constructive. Kind regards, Hari Singh 10:44, 31 January 2008 (MST)

Tell Me One thing

Pehlan Guran nae sadey layi punjabi banayi apan punjabi parhi taanki gurbani parh sakiyae sanu hindi parhni payee taan kee aapan india de mother tounge jaan sakiyae then we learned english which help us in constructing articles. Romanized english easy to understand.

Ik gall dasso what is your language??? Language oh select karo jo sanu samajh awey general hovey? Tuhadi ikk gall ve nahin samajh aundie. Bhai veer singh yaa sant singh maskeen jae arabic ch book chapni shuru kar dindey kimey rehnda??(Lucky 15:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)) Chalo Wadiya Improve karo guru nanak dev diyan gallan nu taanki samjhan ch asani ho sakey. Guru Granth Sahib ina wadiya prepare kita kae parhan da dil karda lines de clarity ho jandi but tusee pata nahin kehri romanized language likh rahey it seems you are Reporter kind of personality. (Lucky 17:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC))

Sunny Deol Singh talk page

Khalsa ji, Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh

Please observe the rule of not changing the text entered by others on any talk page unless it is a violation.

You appear to have changed the question from:

Did Guru Nanak Dev Ji told us Sikh people to believe in the Sect of Sikhism? or is it really the sikh people themself who did created it?

to:

Did Guru Nanak Dev Ji told us Sikh people to believe in Sikhism? or is it really the sikh people themself who did created it?

Because of this change, the previous replies do not make any sense. In future, please just reply below the question in a simple way without too much formatting or hyper-link to your own article page.

I have reverted the user talk page and copied the previous content here. If you wish to respond to Sunny, please re-enter your reply separately without using headings so that the points do not get mixed up with other things. Hari Singhtalk 02:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Sunny Deol Singh talk page and other things

Amita ji and Rajender ji, Sat Sri Akal

With Guru's blessing may this message find you both in good spirits and in chardikala. "..tera ditta sab kavana" Only the Lord is the gifter, all others are beggar at His door. Please do not mistake me for anything else but Satguru Nanak's lowly beggar - A "...kookar tera darbar"

Also, please do not worry about the "infringement" but it is just that we need to stick to a recognised protocol so that we all know where we stand! As for the delay, we are all subject to our daily commitments. Please do not worry about it.

May the Lord shower His blessing on you both always, das. Hari Singhtalk 11:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Confusion

"One", your added sentence appears as gibberish. The font you are using is defaulting to a meaningless scramble of letters and numerals. Niether appering as Gurmukhi or roman letters that make any sense (the quote on Guru Nakak's words. Generally the font used for Gurmukhi defaults to just rows of question marks.

the english translation below it. is unclear as well(.......There is no end to ......!!!!! Do not try to arrive at it or define it. what are the ......(periods for? did Guru Nanak include these? Allenwalla 18:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC))

There is no end to creation? Do not try to reach the end, or even to find it?????