Talk:Vegetarianism Other Views: Difference between revisions
From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Incredible (talk | contribs) |
Incredible (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
''* Nobody is saying it does not include fish, but the point being argued is that machalee = fish and NOT flesh. A subtle but very important point.''--[[User:Incredible|Incredible]] 16:18, 26 September 2006 (CDT) | ''* Nobody is saying it does not include fish, but the point being argued is that machalee = fish and NOT flesh. A subtle but very important point.''--[[User:Incredible|Incredible]] 16:18, 26 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
''Also can we keep the rebuttle's to the vegetarian page. This is an alternative or other view. Rebuttles are not appropriate here.'' --[[User:Incredible|Incredible]] 16:43, 26 September 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 15:43, 26 September 2006
This Page need cleaning up. I may be able to assist.
Cleaning up
This page needs to be properly presented otherwise it will be deleted.
- You start with a wrong translation and then argue the matter. The translation for the Shabad on page 1377 does include "fish" – see here. So this is not the correct starting point for the argument. Please make sure you start with the correct translation. --Hari Singh 09:31, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
* Nobody is saying it does not include fish, but the point being argued is that machalee = fish and NOT flesh. A subtle but very important point.--Incredible 16:18, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
Also can we keep the rebuttle's to the vegetarian page. This is an alternative or other view. Rebuttles are not appropriate here. --Incredible 16:43, 26 September 2006 (CDT)