User talk:Gmustuk: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Change in Main Page on Sikhi Wiki)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Thank you for your kind words of encouragement ==
Gurumustuk Singh Ji, WKWF
I am most grateful for your very kind words of encouragement. I hope, with the help of Sikhi Wiki, the Guru message can reach the wider world – “The Guru’s Sikh, and the Sikh’s Guru, are one and the same; both spread the Guru’s Teachings.” (p444). I hope we as Sikhs can carry out this Hukam of the Guru – to promote the Guru’s Teachings worldwide. I hope with Waheguru blessing we will carry out the tasks that you have outlined on a weekly basis. Navroop Singh & I are in touch by email and we will try and get our friends to join in as well. Again, many thanks for the back up. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 14:50, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
== Review of Changes on SikhiWiki ==
Yes, Gurumustuk I do frequently review changes made by anonymous users (a/users) and have not taken any action if the additions are not harmful or just trivial additions. I have taken this stand hoping to encourage these users to make sensible contribution to this site in future. As the user may just be testing the water, I have ignored additions which are trivial or not of a ‘high’ enough standard.
I have rollback’ed the changes made by a/users, which have been offensive, a violation, blatantly incorrect or distasteful. On one occasion I blocked the user for violation of 3HO page after reading your message regarding this page.
I do not as a rule check the work done by ‘named’ users and I have not checked in great detail the quality of the contributions made by ‘named’ users. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 15:35, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
== Controversial Pages added: ==
== Controversial Pages added: ==


We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - [[Bhai Ram Singh]] and [[Namdhari]]. I have attached a new message by way of [[Template:Controversial]] and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - [[Bhai Ram Singh]] and [[Namdhari]]. I have attached a new message by way of [[Template:Controversial]] and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
==SikhiWiki development==
Thanks Gurumustuk Singh ji for the words of encouragement! Generally I do keep track of new posts to see what information is being put on. As soon as I finish the article on the [[Mool Mantar]], I plan to start sifting through random pages and at least make the articles presentable and clear; some i've read have many grammer mistakes, and some are just blocks of text, which can be dull on the eye. I plan to just work on cleaning up present stuff over the next week or so rather than any new articles. With regards to main page article, I'll discuss with Hari Singh. --[[User:Navroopsehmi|Navroop Singh]] 08:16, 8 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
== Change in Main Page on Sikhi Wiki ==
WKWF, This message is to let you know that the Main Page on SikhiWiki has been changed so that you can rejig the Sikhnet link - The Main feature this week is [[Mool Mantar]] (thanks mainly to Navroop) and as there was space on this left frame, I have added a link to [[Guru Nanak]]. I hope this will be fine with you. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 07:56, 9 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)

Revision as of 20:24, 10 May 2005

Controversial Pages added:

We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - Bhai Ram Singh and Namdhari. I have attached a new message by way of Template:Controversial and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --Hari 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)