User talk:Gmustuk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Hari singh (talk | contribs) (Controversial Topics) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - [[Bhai Ram Singh]] and [[Namdhari]]. I have attached a new message by way of [[Template:Controversial]] and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - [[Bhai Ram Singh]] and [[Namdhari]]. I have attached a new message by way of [[Template:Controversial]] and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | ||
== Controversial Topics == | |||
Gurumustuk Ji, WKWF | |||
Many thanks for your guidelines - I am not sure I have a good understanding of all the points you have made but I take what you say on board. In case of difficulty, I hope you don't mind if these disputed item(s) are forwarded to you for further guidance so we see a pattern being established and learn from that exercise. Many thanks again. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:26, 11 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | |||
Revision as of 06:26, 11 May 2005
Controversial Pages added:
We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - Bhai Ram Singh and Namdhari. I have attached a new message by way of Template:Controversial and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --Hari 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Controversial Topics
Gurumustuk Ji, WKWF
Many thanks for your guidelines - I am not sure I have a good understanding of all the points you have made but I take what you say on board. In case of difficulty, I hope you don't mind if these disputed item(s) are forwarded to you for further guidance so we see a pattern being established and learn from that exercise. Many thanks again. --Hari 05:26, 11 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
