User talk:Gmustuk: Difference between revisions
Hari singh (talk | contribs) (Review of Changes on SikhiWiki) |
Hari singh (talk | contribs) (Controversial Pages added:) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I do not as a rule check the work done by ‘named’ users and I have not checked in great detail the quality of the contributions made by ‘named’ users. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 15:35, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | I do not as a rule check the work done by ‘named’ users and I have not checked in great detail the quality of the contributions made by ‘named’ users. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 15:35, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | ||
== Controversial Pages added: == | |||
We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - [[Bhai Ram Singh]] and [[Namdhari]]. I have attached a new message by way of [[Template:Controversial]] and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --[[User:Hari singh|Hari]] 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time) | |||
Revision as of 06:14, 7 May 2005
Thank you for your kind words of encouragement
Gurumustuk Singh Ji, WKWF
I am most grateful for your very kind words of encouragement. I hope, with the help of Sikhi Wiki, the Guru message can reach the wider world – “The Guru’s Sikh, and the Sikh’s Guru, are one and the same; both spread the Guru’s Teachings.” (p444). I hope we as Sikhs can carry out this Hukam of the Guru – to promote the Guru’s Teachings worldwide. I hope with Waheguru blessing we will carry out the tasks that you have outlined on a weekly basis. Navroop Singh & I are in touch by email and we will try and get our friends to join in as well. Again, many thanks for the back up. --Hari 14:50, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Review of Changes on SikhiWiki
Yes, Gurumustuk I do frequently review changes made by anonymous users (a/users) and have not taken any action if the additions are not harmful or just trivial additions. I have taken this stand hoping to encourage these users to make sensible contribution to this site in future. As the user may just be testing the water, I have ignored additions which are trivial or not of a ‘high’ enough standard.
I have rollback’ed the changes made by a/users, which have been offensive, a violation, blatantly incorrect or distasteful. On one occasion I blocked the user for violation of 3HO page after reading your message regarding this page.
I do not as a rule check the work done by ‘named’ users and I have not checked in great detail the quality of the contributions made by ‘named’ users. --Hari 15:35, 6 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Controversial Pages added:
We have had two pages added to SikhiWiki recently which are controvesial - Bhai Ram Singh and Namdhari. I have attached a new message by way of Template:Controversial and deleted disputed points but also added some non-disputed points so, at least we know who or what we are talking about. Where should the line be drawn on this? Could the bureaucrats give some guidance on this? or do you want to see how matters develop? Many thanks. --Hari 05:14, 7 May 2005 (Pacific Daylight Time)
