User:Rayonkavin: Difference between revisions
(→Gaviy Suniy Man Rakhiy Bhau: refined text) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
I entirely agree with you & look forward to further sharing your frank & fair views. | I entirely agree with you & look forward to further sharing your frank & fair views. | ||
We Sikhs however, must understand 'Khade Di Pahul' as a formal socio-religious statement, which each one of us is obliged to make. A statement that conveys this - "We [[Sikh]]s understand one & only one Amrit i.e. - the Words of Nanak". | |||
The literal | The literal 'Amrit' used in reference to 'Khade Ki pahul' has to be co-related with the term 'Amrit' used in Bani. Bani uses it with the backdrop of 'Sagun' & 'Nirgun' faith of Sikhism encapsulated in [[Mool_Mantar]].'TRUTH'(GOD) menifests itself as IDOL of 'TRUTH'(KHALSA)for which 10th Guru formalised what Nanak had envisioned(IDOL of TRUTH). | ||
for which 10th Guru formalised what Nanak had envisioned(IDOL of TRUTH). | |||
'''Sagun'''(Amrit as administered for Social, Spiritual & Martial organisation of the Sikh Society as per God's 'Hukums' outlined in SGGS) | '''Sagun'''(Amrit as administered for Social, Spiritual & Martial organisation of the Sikh Society as per God's 'Hukums' outlined in SGGS) | ||
Revision as of 10:21, 8 October 2005
I have gone through lot many blogs and read different ideas of different people and their way to discribe dhur ki baani is also different. I just wanna tell that when dhur ki baani was written by Guruji, there was only one meaning of it and not many. We always use to say "okay, is it so easy to understand gurbani", we have never thought that why guruji will make it difficult for us to understand ??
We hear in every day life, "Tussa Amrit Chakaya hai ?" , "Amrit Parchaar Karo!" ... What we understand by these two sentences ?? Rather it should be "Khande di pahul chhaaki hai?", "Khande di Pahul Chhaako !" As per Gurbani ----
"Nanak Amrit ek hai, duja amrit nahi. Nanak Amrit mane mahi, paiye gur parsadi."
When Guruji themself said that there is only one Amrit, then how can we say Amrit to Khande di Pahul. They are two diffenent things..
All I want to say is.. We need to read banis and not only read but to understand them..... They are really not difficult.... However, you will do that if the Almighty wants !!
Bhula Chooka di shamaa !!
Babe aage ik hi ardaas hai ki sab nu bani naal joode !
Please send me your comments, I would really love to see them !
Manmeet Singh ([email protected])
Gaviy Suniy Man Rakhiy Bhau
Maan Yog Manmeet Ji WKWF!
I entirely agree with you & look forward to further sharing your frank & fair views.
We Sikhs however, must understand 'Khade Di Pahul' as a formal socio-religious statement, which each one of us is obliged to make. A statement that conveys this - "We Sikhs understand one & only one Amrit i.e. - the Words of Nanak".
The literal 'Amrit' used in reference to 'Khade Ki pahul' has to be co-related with the term 'Amrit' used in Bani. Bani uses it with the backdrop of 'Sagun' & 'Nirgun' faith of Sikhism encapsulated in Mool_Mantar.'TRUTH'(GOD) menifests itself as IDOL of 'TRUTH'(KHALSA)for which 10th Guru formalised what Nanak had envisioned(IDOL of TRUTH).
Sagun(Amrit as administered for Social, Spiritual & Martial organisation of the Sikh Society as per God's 'Hukums' outlined in SGGS)
Nirgun(Amrit as apears in Gurbani)'
WKWF !
Nanak Ghar ka Gola Amita Singh, 08 45 pm indian standard time
