Talk:Krishna: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (questions to Lucky ji)
 
m (comments on material that i think is out of place.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Veer ji, what are you trying to say here?
Page on Krishna


''Krisna''' is spirit which born on the earth and which plays on bank of Yamuna, seems pretty much in line with the Hindu version
The posting of illustrations that include images and iconography of another's religion in a negative light, such as the included imagery of Krishna with a flute with a big red x over it, and one with an image clearly understood to be that of Guru Gobind Singh aiming one of his arrows at Krishna's heart while naked women with their breasts exposed dance about in their bath, seems very out of place here.


what do you mean by spirit?
How would one feel seeing the Khanda, Nishan Sahib or an image of any Sikh Guru painted over with a red X?


I remember the outrage over the use of an image often said to be a depiction of a particular Guru, in the UK or US that was used to hawk some product.


from the page:
Guru Gobind Singh's father died in defense Hindus being able to practice their religion in their own way, no doubt Guru Tegh Bahadur's sacrifice and martyrdom played a large role in his son's decision to initiate the Khalsa.


Gurmat has a different view, '''Krisna''' is spirit which born on the earth and which plays on bank of Yamuna (The Path of Yamm = Manmatt). Every person is Krisna and Ram (God) is present in every person. Hindus are not able to say that both are different but as they did not understand their concept and made Brindaban, Dwarka, Ayodhya outside how could they say them one?
I think he saw the Bani of the Singhs as a lamp post in a sea of trouble, someone to look to for help, not as someone making fun of or bragging of the superior aspects of one's religion over anothers.


Suggest: … how could they say they are one?  What are they saying are one - Brindaban, Dwarka and Ayodhya?
If we need to express personal opinions or the darkness of our own minds, I think we should limit that to the talk pages and leave our opinions, whether brilliant or idiotic out of the pages.


Do you mean they each are said to be the birth place of Krsna?
[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 23:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Are you saying we are all Krisna - the spirit?
 
Are you saying Hindus do not understand the concepts of their own religion? The line seems  very condescending.
 
What Hindus cannot say that BOTH are different. What is the BOTH and how do you think they are different?
 
Colour me confused. Perhaps I'm to dim to understand.
 
Rab Rakhaa, [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 09:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:28, 25 July 2010

Page on Krishna

The posting of illustrations that include images and iconography of another's religion in a negative light, such as the included imagery of Krishna with a flute with a big red x over it, and one with an image clearly understood to be that of Guru Gobind Singh aiming one of his arrows at Krishna's heart while naked women with their breasts exposed dance about in their bath, seems very out of place here.

How would one feel seeing the Khanda, Nishan Sahib or an image of any Sikh Guru painted over with a red X?

I remember the outrage over the use of an image often said to be a depiction of a particular Guru, in the UK or US that was used to hawk some product.

Guru Gobind Singh's father died in defense Hindus being able to practice their religion in their own way, no doubt Guru Tegh Bahadur's sacrifice and martyrdom played a large role in his son's decision to initiate the Khalsa.

I think he saw the Bani of the Singhs as a lamp post in a sea of trouble, someone to look to for help, not as someone making fun of or bragging of the superior aspects of one's religion over anothers.

If we need to express personal opinions or the darkness of our own minds, I think we should limit that to the talk pages and leave our opinions, whether brilliant or idiotic out of the pages.

Allenwalla 23:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)