Because the followers of these Gurus are maximum Sikhs.
does this mean that they are in the majority, outnumbering orthodox Sikhs?Allenwalla 18:11, 17 December 2007 (MST)
No sir actually illitrate as well as the so called low caste sikhs are followers. In Sikhism no place and respect for such Gurus who have no big impact on it.
The word orthodox is not suitable as sikhism is the most modern as well as youngest religion in this world. These selfstyled gurus have been erected to kill Sikhism. user:sarbjeet_1313me
still do not know why someone would refer to the less educated as maximum
so as they are usually successful with the less educated or illiterate Sikhs, i do not know why the word maximum should be used. As maximum usually means biggest or best, maximum output, maximum effort
sounds like weakest or most vulnerable should be substituted.Allenwalla 20:44, 17 December 2007 (MST)
marginal? i can see that wealth might be a factor as well, i looked up modern Gurus but the article has little info with nothing in relating articles.