User talk:Kular65: Difference between revisions

Hello, Sat Sri Akal, W.K.W.F: Kular65 Ji! A very warm welcome from SikhiWiki and many thanks for your contributions so far. I hope you will keep visiting this website and that you will help us enhance it by checking it, amending it, by adding to it, by discussing issues on the discussion pages, etc. Please feel free to add to or amend any of the topics that you have knowledge about. Don't worry about making mistakes, as these can be easily corrected.

For more guidance please see Help or contact me through my user page here.
With Waheguru's kirpa, may you always remain in Chardi kala. Many thanks, Hari Singh 10:13, 28 August 2007 (EDT)

Mohammed

Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh Kular ji

I am sorry but it was not my intention to cause you any offence; I feel I have. I apologise for making you feel uncomfortable and intimidated by what I said and did. May the Guru bless us so that we can better understand his message and behave in a manner which would be in keeping with that supreme message. I am sorry but I did not express my views more lovingly as required by the Guru.

However, for what you did, I am highly proud and very grateful. Your action are those of a humble and loving Sikh of the gracious and mighty Guru. May Waheguru continue to guide us so that we may spread His message in the best way that we can. I hope the Guru gives you the strength to express your ideas with the delicate touch that I am sure are capable. My kind regards & the Guru's most abundant blessings, Hari Singh 17:19, 5 April 2008 (MDT)

Welcome to Sikhiwiki

Sat Shri Akaal, Kular ji, please continue to contribute. I have expanded your preface to Daulat Rai's book giving a few details of his purpose in writing it.

Regards, Allenwalla 14:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Dear sir I will do as you have asked. thank you Gurfathe ji kular--Kular65 17:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Edits

Tarlochan Singh Kular ji, thanks for the many catches of typos, ect. on the Bhagat Singh article, however I was puzzled by the removal of a whole paragraph without any explanation.

I have added some of the info back, please let me know if this is objectionable.

Rab Rakha, Allenwalla 16:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I have no objection as to what you have done. as for why i have deleted your artical was, it was incomplete as to how the Assembly bomb case came about. I have found a book with the original telegrams and eyewitness which were presented to the court. In it are the articals that have not been written since 1946 with ref: to Mahatma Gandhi and the rest. I am sorry if you were offended by my crude method of deleting your articals, i would have written later on as to why i had erased your paragraphs.

Gurfathe ji Kular--Kular65 16:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Allenwala ji, shall i carry on with my contribution on the Bhagat Singh because i think that the readers of this site can have a full indepth study of the case. Regarding the conspiracy theories of M.K. Gandhi, before the conclusion of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact of 1931 M.K. Gandhi could have asked the Viceroy to commute the sentences to life imprisonment, he felt that it was not in the larger intrests of the country.

For refrence see, The History of the Indian National Congress, Vol. 1, Bombay (1946), page 442.

i can go on and on

Waiting for your reply.

Gurfathe ji--Kular65 17:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Not my article

Sardar ji, The article was not mine and I have no idea who wrote what as I do not bother to look. Like you, I think the truth of the matter is what should be represented here. I left your additions alone and added in only the translation of the phrase, because it looked as if the other words they yelled out, were the translation. I wish you would write a page on the euphemism - 'Transportation for Life'. I can't find out if he was sent to 'Black water - (Andamans. Again thanks for all your help.

Allenwalla 20:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Pros and cons

Bhai Sahib ji, Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh

Many thanks for your kind message; I am most grateful for your words of encouragement; may Waheguru assist us further so that we can be worthy to be called His sevadars. Bhai sahib, we are humble servants of the Guru unworthy of any calibre; much needs to be done in the world but we have done very little so far; only with the Guru's assistance we will ever make any real progress.

As you rightly say, SGGS is our source of spiritual guidance; we wish to follow the model set by the Gurus. Yes, pros and cons are important but without keeping to the guidance of the holy Granth we will be wasting our time. Saying negatives about a person unnecessarily is not something that I wish to associate with; the Gurus did not do it and the Sikhs should not. You can criticise the wrong but why criticise the wrong doer; he is just lost as are we in this jungle of Maya; we are all doers of wrong on this earth; so where will we stop!

Please feel free to give your views as only by sharing can we better understand Gurmat. Kind regards, Hari Singh^talk 22:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)