User talk:Gurujot Singh: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Navroopsehmi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 05:20, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time) | --[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 05:20, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time) | ||
---- | |||
Having the 'Glossary of Sikh Terms' as a cateogry as opposed to a single article ([[Glossary of Sikh Terms]]) is def. easier to navigate. The simple definitions would probably need to incorporate links to the larger articles as a 'for more info see...etc'. Definitions already in the Glossary of Sikh Terms article need to be added to the cat. | |||
--[[User:Navroopsehmi|Navroopsehmi]] 05:32, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time) | |||
Revision as of 07:32, 1 April 2005
WJKF, you've added a serious of articles under 'Glossary of Terms' and in the article name, you've included a colon and so where they may have been an article already extant, you've added an additional one i.e there are two articles on the Dasam Granth - one is Dasam Granth and the other Dasam Granth: - should the two not be one and the same? WJKF--Navroopsehmi 01:21, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time)
I already spoke to Gurujot about this...and he had explained his thinking. On Monday he is going to fix this and consolidate them. He was thinking that one might just be a simple definition and the other more detailed. He will consolidate them to one article...and maybe have a summary explanation at the top of the article.
--WikiSysop 05:20, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time)
Having the 'Glossary of Sikh Terms' as a cateogry as opposed to a single article (Glossary of Sikh Terms) is def. easier to navigate. The simple definitions would probably need to incorporate links to the larger articles as a 'for more info see...etc'. Definitions already in the Glossary of Sikh Terms article need to be added to the cat. --Navroopsehmi 05:32, 1 Apr 2005 (Pacific Standard Time)
