Talk:Vivekananda and Ramakrishna on Sikhism: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The article which had little to do about the two men's views concerning Sikhi was really a quite disgusting attack on Vivekananda.
The article had little to do with its title. What little that had to do there words on Sikhi was left and other quotes were added.


It would have been better to have been titled -- The Disgusting life of Vivekananda. Their are many who would be deeply hurt by the article, if I saw anyone writing such trash about the Sikh Gurus I would be outragged.
Some minor neutral history of the 2 men was added. [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 02:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


The recent edit turned into another article that had nothing to do with the topic, as it was only a flowery bio on Vivekananda.
two messages by article(¬¬¬¬)
 
So I gave minimal facts (history) on both men for strangers who might come across the page unaware of who Vivekananda was.
 
I also tried to make sense of the few sentences that had to do with the stated topic.
 
The clearly hate filled page, not something the Gurus would have been proud to see here, was not even signed by the author.
 
The sentences that do have to do with the topic are not cited (i.e. we do not know where these came from -- were they invented by the writers mind (his/her ORIGINAL RESEARCH or are they in the man's writing.
 
Please if my efforts have left out something important out - please add it back in.  Are all Hindus are out to destroy Sikhi, (clearly there are those who believe that Sikhi is a sect of Hinduism, but this page is about what these two men thought about Sikhism.
 
Also I think the title would be better as Vivekananda and Ramakrishna on Sikhism.
 
[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 13:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC) will erase in a few days.
 
 
* the article is from unknown source, i am finding it, once i will find i will link. some anti vivekananda might wrote that article. i even don't know who vivekananda is neither i want to know about him. thanks for retouching sir. Lucky (¬¬¬¬)

Latest revision as of 22:10, 19 February 2010

The article had little to do with its title. What little that had to do there words on Sikhi was left and other quotes were added.

Some minor neutral history of the 2 men was added. Allenwalla 02:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

two messages by article(¬¬¬¬)