Talk:RSS-WHO ARE THEY?: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Sir ji please check again the article has been recommended for delete as it is '''REPEAT''' | Sir ji please check again the article has been recommended for delete as it is '''REPEAT''' | ||
--[[user:sarbjeet_1313me]] 11:23, 9 May 2008 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:23, 9 May 2008
SSA, as a person who is uninformed/ has been uninformed vis a vis the RSS and a person who found the picture of a Scotsman and some Sikh soldiers with a big RSS painted (photoshop) across the background of a photo on this site i find it surprising that this article is being deleted. It was posted by a Sikh who i feel has great respect for Shikhi and is in the spirit of keeping people well informed (at least me).
Do we think that this is harmful to the RSS and should be removed as an unfair attack? Are there any positive things to be said about the organization?
Or do we just think that not talking about or ignoring the '300 hundred pound gorilla in the room' it will just go away. After seeing all the questions that were raised where some, on other sights, had critisizied 3HO and this site of biased editing. Is this not in the same ball park.
Personally i think it is better to be forewarned and thus forearmed. Allenwalla 09:55, 9 May 2008 (MDT)
Sir ji please check again the article has been recommended for delete as it is REPEAT
--user:sarbjeet_1313me 11:23, 9 May 2008 (MDT)
