Talk:Battle of Sirhind: Difference between revisions
Allenwalla (talk | contribs) m (Created page with 'Added some history that explained details to those who did not know the background. The article said the meeting of the Guru and the faquir was accidental. I have read that he w...') |
Hari singh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The article said the meeting of the Guru and the faquir was accidental. I have read that he was purposefully looking for LachmanDas many times in many stories. This is the first I have read of this meeting being accidental? Any thoughts on this? [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 17:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | The article said the meeting of the Guru and the faquir was accidental. I have read that he was purposefully looking for LachmanDas many times in many stories. This is the first I have read of this meeting being accidental? Any thoughts on this? [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 17:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
To the original writer of the article, it appeared that the meeting was accidental as the Guru appeared to stumble onto Lachmandas' hut. It is a subjective stand which I did not interfere with. The Guru must have known but the sangat with the Guru did not known what to expect. It was a minor detail which I did not feel the need to change. Will leave it to you to decide if it needs amending? [[user:hari singh|Hari Singh]]<sup>[[User talk:Hari singh|talk]]</sup> 21:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 26 May 2009
Added some history that explained details to those who did not know the background.
The article said the meeting of the Guru and the faquir was accidental. I have read that he was purposefully looking for LachmanDas many times in many stories. This is the first I have read of this meeting being accidental? Any thoughts on this? Allenwalla 17:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
To the original writer of the article, it appeared that the meeting was accidental as the Guru appeared to stumble onto Lachmandas' hut. It is a subjective stand which I did not interfere with. The Guru must have known but the sangat with the Guru did not known what to expect. It was a minor detail which I did not feel the need to change. Will leave it to you to decide if it needs amending? Hari Singhtalk 21:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
