Talk:Arain people: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I like both new? messages, but
My earlier comments were about the casteism warning which says (don't edit - do comment)
{{socialstub}}


{{nocasteism}}
Largely taken from wikipedia i removed the occasional numbers to the references that were not included.
 
and
 
 
{{socialstub}}


seem to be at odds?
One writer stated that some Arains had become Hindus and Sikhs, another retorted much later that Arains were 100% Muslims (such a claim should be on a talk page, as their are many Muslims who became Sikhs). I have to wonder is this the personal knowledge of the writer or a verified fact. How could anyone ever know this? The only reason I can see for this article being here is some connection to Sikhi. The title which I was reading was one given to the Arains as an Honor has now dissappeared. Mian if it was used by only Arain families would tie the article in with any link to Mian Mir. Anyone who knows of any research on this?[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 04:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:30, 24 September 2008

My earlier comments were about the casteism warning which says (don't edit - do comment)

Largely taken from wikipedia i removed the occasional numbers to the references that were not included.

One writer stated that some Arains had become Hindus and Sikhs, another retorted much later that Arains were 100% Muslims (such a claim should be on a talk page, as their are many Muslims who became Sikhs). I have to wonder is this the personal knowledge of the writer or a verified fact. How could anyone ever know this? The only reason I can see for this article being here is some connection to Sikhi. The title which I was reading was one given to the Arains as an Honor has now dissappeared. Mian if it was used by only Arain families would tie the article in with any link to Mian Mir. Anyone who knows of any research on this?Allenwalla 04:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)