Keshdhari: Difference between revisions
From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Allenwalla (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
AmandaCusack (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. If a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. There should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs. A sikh who has kept hair but following different path is a MANMUKH. But by naming sikhs Keshdharis it means we are recognizing others as Sikhs who have not kept hair. | A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. If a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. There should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs. A sikh who has kept hair but following different path is a MANMUKH. But by naming sikhs Keshdharis it means we are recognizing others as Sikhs who have not kept hair. [http://www.casino-spielen.biz casino spielen] | ||
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::sarbjeet_1313me | :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::sarbjeet_1313me | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 14 July 2010
A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. If a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. There should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs. A sikh who has kept hair but following different path is a MANMUKH. But by naming sikhs Keshdharis it means we are recognizing others as Sikhs who have not kept hair. casino spielen
- sarbjeet_1313me
