Talk:Mazhabi: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (wondering why the article is labeled non sikh please see discussion, do some taints last forever??)
 
Line 8: Line 8:


the article consists of two parts the first a little more prejudicial. the warriors i read of here seem pretty Sikh to me.[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 15:55, 14 December 2007 (MST)
the article consists of two parts the first a little more prejudicial. the warriors i read of here seem pretty Sikh to me.[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 15:55, 14 December 2007 (MST)
== still wondering why this article has the prejorative preface ==
[[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 07:17, 15 May 2008 (MDT)

Revision as of 07:17, 15 May 2008

Are the people of GURDWARA SHAHID BURJ BHAI JIVAN SINGH ashamed to be associated with the name of a Mazbi? Linking the above article to Mazbi i was shocked.

I have always admired Jivan Singh who dared to steal the Head of Guru Tejh Bahadur and carry it to his son for cremation. i knew nothing of his gotra or caste history. Linking the above article to Mazbi, which i had to change the spelling to do; i was surprised to find the majhabi article with a heading saying the article contained just about anything a person could condemn including:

This article may contain Sects or Cults, Fake Babas, Deras, Fake Nihangs, Sanatan Dharmis, Pseudo Akalis & Mahants, Pseudo Intellectuals & Historians, Leftists and agnostic which are not considered a part of Sikhism. The article is just for information purposes.

are the above things the mazbi's should never be or things they pretent when they aspire to. As this is the message that comes up for Template:Non Sikh Article

the article consists of two parts the first a little more prejudicial. the warriors i read of here seem pretty Sikh to me.Allenwalla 15:55, 14 December 2007 (MST)

still wondering why this article has the prejorative preface

Allenwalla 07:17, 15 May 2008 (MDT)