Talk:Ek Onkar: Difference between revisions
From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: This is not Ik Onkar This is ""Ik oooo"". Read the whole symbol carefully it means Ik(One), and O (means that) and o is beant so thats why its not ending.) |
Allenwalla (talk | contribs) m (→Someone clouding the issue: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is ""Ik oooo"". Read the whole symbol carefully it means Ik(One), and O (means that) and o is beant so thats why its not ending. | This is ""Ik oooo"". Read the whole symbol carefully it means Ik(One), and O (means that) and o is beant so thats why its not ending. | ||
== Someone clouding the issue == | |||
this page contains a quote that describes God as-- Him and even says 'He' is a person. would -- both all that exists plus the void of Stephen Hawking's 'black holes', i.e. shunya, not be a part of existence? [[User:Allenwalla|Allenwalla]] 18:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Is this a poor translation of the person's words? | |||
Latest revision as of 12:14, 21 June 2009
This is not Ik Onkar
This is ""Ik oooo"". Read the whole symbol carefully it means Ik(One), and O (means that) and o is beant so thats why its not ending.
Someone clouding the issue
this page contains a quote that describes God as-- Him and even says 'He' is a person. would -- both all that exists plus the void of Stephen Hawking's 'black holes', i.e. shunya, not be a part of existence? Allenwalla 18:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Is this a poor translation of the person's words?
