Keshdhari: Difference between revisions
From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (New page: A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh.As if a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. there should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs.A sikh who has kept hair but following different pa...) |
Allenwalla (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. | A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. If a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. There should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs. A sikh who has kept hair but following different path is a MANMUKH. But by naming sikhs Keshdharis it means we are recognizing others as Sikhs who have not kept hair. | ||
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::sarbjeet_1313me | |||
Revision as of 22:59, 18 October 2008
A sikh without keshas is not considered a sikh. If a sikh cuts his hair he is 'patit'. There should be no category of Keshadhari sikhs. A sikh who has kept hair but following different path is a MANMUKH. But by naming sikhs Keshdharis it means we are recognizing others as Sikhs who have not kept hair.
- sarbjeet_1313me
