FAQ: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 190: Line 190:
By Sikhs refusing to acknowledge that Guru Nanak was claiming to be a Prophet, they sidestep this issue. This is in order to avoid any  means of principles of falsification, in order to confirm or disprove the Guru’s “Prophethood”.  
By Sikhs refusing to acknowledge that Guru Nanak was claiming to be a Prophet, they sidestep this issue. This is in order to avoid any  means of principles of falsification, in order to confirm or disprove the Guru’s “Prophethood”.  


'''ANSWER'''
There is no proof that biblical accounts occurred, the great flood, nor the parting. Although the Quran, the Bible and the Torah all mention Moses, they each have different views and accounts of his life over 2000 years ago. Nor is there a rule that all prophets must be verified as you claim.
Guru Nanak was neither a teacher nor a prophet. He carried within him a divine light. Seeing the world for what it is, he endured to allow others to be blessed with Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love). So everyone could be blessed with Dharam, and Gian. He was alike all saints that had experienced enlightenment and salvation except that we aimed to share this gift with others. Guru Granth Sahib contains verses composed by saints of other faiths, proving that salvation is not a right of those adhering to a certain religion. But for those who radiate love due to a way of life, and a philosophy of truth. Unbound by religious domination and incoherent guidelines, and unrestricted from the invisible borderlines we've cast on the Earth.


Guru Nanak made 5 Udasis (journeys) and everywhere he went and every person he met had their life changed. This proof is found when you research Sikh Gurdwaras, most people expect beautiful structures like Harimandir Sahib or Anandpur Sahib, what you will find however is that Guru Nanak in just a moment, in one discussion, changed the lives of shopkeepers and people in simple homes to independently choose to serve their creator. Converting their home or shop into a Gurdwara, serving langar (free food for all) and a place to sing the praises of Waheguru. As for miracles, there were many, such as the boulder in Panja Sahib, or during Guru Nanak's imprisonment. There are countless stories, but the Guru nor the students of Sikhi rely on rating and judging the extent of the miracles at that time or in the present. The Guru's message was clear and it was potent and it was powerful. Enough to transform lives and bring elements of the divine light to anyone who wishes to experience it.
The two largest religions of Earth, Islam and Christianity. Are the oldest religions, stemming from Moses' interactions with God. Both teach that they are the only way to be "saved". Both inherently instruct their followers to create their 'brotherhood' apart of the brotherhood that binds us all, of humanity. It teaches segregation and to reserve pity for the fellow humans who have not been "saved". This single element is the primal cause of war and responsible for the deaths of untold millions of people, and further will forever cause humanity to subjugate itself.




Line 205: Line 211:


How can it be that a divinely inspired work, detailing the life of the Guru, can be so inaccurate?
How can it be that a divinely inspired work, detailing the life of the Guru, can be so inaccurate?
'''ANSWER'''
Your statements are baseless, and there is no distinct facts that prove what you say. Most Sikh history comes from the archives of the Mughal Empire which ruled for near a thousand years. The most relevant duration also known as the Classic period started with Babar and ended with Aurangzeb, about 1400-1700. From these accounts we know the exact dates of the interactions and developments of Sikhism. Which at the time was not an organized religion, it unified later culminating at Vaisakhi in 1699. The Guru's after Guru Nanak were chosen by divine intervention, to complete a new way of life, an understanding for the people. As proven that from 1469 to 1708, a new philosophy was created and within that came a new language, culture, music, martial art, a moral code, and a legal jurisdiction among other things.
Not all the 10 Guru's composed spiritual hymns, each one had their individual missions to complete Sikhi. Considering that Guru's never allowed their physical forms to be sketched in any way, nor even their hymns to be named (as noted by some compostion's titled Mahala). The closest identifying trait is the composition stating it was the divine light in its various incarnation.)
Therefore all the questions you pose are completely baseless and have no historical fact attributed to it. These "errors" that you speak of are just your attempt to create a discrepancy where there is none. Sikh history is only 500 years only and very easy to research. A better question to ask would be why the gospel of Luke contradicts the old testament. Or why the Bible, book of Mormon and the King James Bible disaffirm one another.


B.The Guru Granth Sahib Ji
B.The Guru Granth Sahib Ji
Line 215: Line 228:
     * Claims there is only one way to God, then says many ways
     * Claims there is only one way to God, then says many ways
     * Reincarnation is taught in one section, yet is rejected elsewhere
     * Reincarnation is taught in one section, yet is rejected elsewhere
How can it be that a Divinely inspired book, a Guru, a way to God, be so full of contradictions?
In addition to this, the Book provides no details of the origins of the Earth or of Man, and provides no answers to “where did we come from” as a result. Surely any divinely inspired text would present Gods answer to these questions?


Answer: It would appear that you are not conversant with the Guru's Shabad, hence your statement. Please seek advice from a Gaini who is fully conversant and understands the Guru's Shabad and he will clarify any doubts in your mind if you are a Sikh. If follow another religion, please read more about Sikhism or speak to someone who is knowledgeable about Sikhi.
Answer: It would appear that you are not conversant with the Guru's Shabad, hence your statement. Please seek advice from a Gaini who is fully conversant and understands the Guru's Shabad and he will clarify any doubts in your mind if you are a Sikh. If follow another religion, please read more about Sikhism or speak to someone who is knowledgeable about Sikhi.
Line 221: Line 237:
Waheguru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ke Fateh.
Waheguru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ke Fateh.


'''ANSWER'''
Your statement points out your unfamiliarity with not just Sikhi but most importantly your lack of a relationship with God, our Creator.


How can it be that a Divinely inspired book, a Guru, a way to God, be so full of contradictions?
Waheguru IS sargun and nirgun. God IS everywhere but nowhere, Our Creator HAS a million forms but has none.
In addition to this, the Book provides no details of the origins of the Earth or of Man, and provides no answers to “where did we come from” as a result. Surely any divinely inspired text would present Gods answer to these questions?
 
Guru Nanak said, trying to approximate Waheguru is a foolish attempt. One who truly sees, one who truly meets God, will be in awe, and in that bliss will be unable to explain the experience. They can relate certain things, events. But to describe the Creator, their task can never be completed.
 
The Guru's who composed hymns, did so to espouse the glory of God, the true beauty experienced beyond our 5 sensory inputs. And listening to these Gurbani compositions puts the human listening in the same harmony as those whom elations at meeting the true lord causes their souls to sing. That when experienced, the pure love emanating will cause other souls to vibrate in the same manner.
 
In truth there are many ways to God. But regardless at the pinnacle of each, all those who attain enlightenment and salvation will have commonalities. As proven by the Sufi Saint Kabir, Guru Nanak and Bhagat Ravi Das. All who grew up being taught various rituals and opposing sides of worship. However, at their ascension their lives were changed, they shed human attachments and many aspects of their radiance while unique are similiar to each other.(Read their histories to understand more about their lives) Because when one truly feels their love for God and God's love for the person, that union is in and of itself a new distinction, a new form of being. a being free of maya, understanding this world play, this atomic drama and in constant vibration with the heavens.


Reincarnation is not rejected in "other sections". The cycle is also known as a "hell" in virtue of the separation of the atma from the Parmatma.


Why most God answer all your questions? Especially in written form. Must Waheguru complete an essay, a thesis on why God created this creation and also then tell you why you must feel love for God before you indulge or bestow your love graciously? I can tell you that the true journey we all share is an attempt to negate duality. For whatever reason our soul is trapped in this shell. With our body reacting to our 5 sensory inputs with kam (Lust), krodh (Rage or uncontrolled anger), lobh (Greed), moh (Attachment or emotional attachment) and ahankar (ego) and the soul responding with Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love). Choosing the right path and eclipsing duality will us to grow and develop, while educating us and enhancing our conscience. Which is exactly what Sikh means. A student, on a quest to expand our conscience. With Waheguru's blessing will we truly understand right and wrong while moving closer to a union with the one that made us.


----
----
Line 239: Line 264:


   
   
Re-incarnation is therefore absurd, and cannot be correct because it does not agree with rationality.
'''ANSWER'''
There is no global scale of evil and morality to measure this "decline".
You speak as if this creation is the ONLY creation and that this place is our permanent home. Yet every second of every day beings come and go from this place. "Spiritual Karma" is not meant to do anything. It is simply the set of rules, the code that a soul is bound by. Like a child who makes mistakes, steals and once older regrets the crimes so does the soul. Our justice is doled out on a scale unimaginable by mere human minds. Most people believe that a perpetual self exists within themselves, the soul. A body can be judged and tried for crimes in a human court for a crime. However to coalesce all deeds which originally result from the improper choice of action heeded by duality, would put the soul on trial for all it's actions. The penance would be carried out based on the scale of exact right and wrong. Since most are doubtless of their belief in their undying true self, there must be guidelines for it to adhere too. In this cycle of life, within this creation, this is the system that all must face, for all their crimes whether or not tried or rehabilitated by our judicial system. Aurengzeb himself wrote that he feared what he would say in the court of the Lord as he was ashamed of the actions of his life.
There is no primal Evil one. One who can challenge God does not exist. Thinking othewise, regardless of the back story is disrespectful and belittling of the Creator.


Re-incarnation is therefore absurd, and cannot be correct because it does not agree with rationality.  
The sentence of rebirth is in fact the truest form of justice. If you understand Sikhi you would know that Guru Nanak said, even a King is lower than an ant whom in it's mind never forgets it's creator. When we are free of the vessel in this creation, the soul is aware of all it's transgressions and actions, from it's inception to it's history of lives. And each vessel has it's own ways of interaction with the creation and it is limited to that. Such as a human without sight or another sense or even someone with an impairment. Humanity is the only form whereby our difference in instinct and free will can be expressed. Reincarnated into an ant, we are aware of all that we have experienced and as such have nothing but awe for God, but we serve out our purpose, reacting on pure instinct, aware of but unable to emote and fulfilling the principle of the creature's role in the creation. While we serve out our penance until we can achieve a human birth, and try once more to balance out our karmic scale, in an effort to be better.
 
True, there are more humans than before. Although this is an absurd statement as no one can know the will of our Creator, you would do better to ask God the question of why there are more humans now. But to provide you with something to sustain your curiosity; why are there less animals? and less trees? With global deforestation and more and more animals on the endangered list perhaps those souls now embody a different species of life and have found home in humankind. Regardless these are the questions answerable only by the one who presents the conundrum. But what this question you pose uncovers is something more unveiling. The primal Why. Why must "GOD" provide you with all the answers you seek. It only makes sense that each individual person would receive gian, understanding as they each are fit to understand it.
 
If this is the pinnacle of creation and you are the penultimate being, why do you not already know? Why do you subsequently die, while this world is filled with good and bad and the evanescense of life sustaining you, the departing transient? Until you find tranquility in the question "why?", and the contentment of your being, you will never transcend, you will never be able to accept truth. Instead be haunted by fear of the unknown hoping someone will come to give you the answers, at which point you will believe anything written before you that claims it as such. Those that take the easy path, the quick journey to seek answers will not find truth, will instead be beguiled by false claims.




Line 252: Line 289:
Secondly, how can God be within everyone? What is the point, according to Sikhism, of trying to attain Union with God, when God is already within us according to their scriptures? How can God be within people and objects which are intrinsically evil?
Secondly, how can God be within everyone? What is the point, according to Sikhism, of trying to attain Union with God, when God is already within us according to their scriptures? How can God be within people and objects which are intrinsically evil?


'''Answer'''
Again your relationship with God is revealed with the questions you ask, especially this one.
In this creation, the 'world ocean' which we are all drowning in, God is everywhere. God exists in every nucleus of every atom. You look at this creation simply as a planet on which you live. Yet Waheguru has made not only with planet, this solar system, this universe, and even this entire dimension, but there is so much more. You are entrapped by the confines of your senses, and now believe that a true existence can only be one that includes your 5 ways to manipulate and experience your life on this planet. Know that our creator has made a drama of atoms, one that we are entranced by. So eluded are we with the experience of only the 5 senses available to us we do not even begin to think of much greater God can be. I can only give you these simple examples, because again, gian is blessed upon those who are ready for it, we each each a song in the same physical manner, yet each of us have favourite songs. Scientists have yet to figure out why certain people recite a song over and over again. Unable to develop an algorithm to explain of the phenomena of favourites. The same applies to how people see. Although the physical process is the same for everyone, some people see the true beauty of an object.
God is within us, and everything. Everything in this creation. But that doesn't mean you are in God's grace. Just the same that you may be physically close to someone, but are not emotionally close.
Also no one is evil. People who are consumed by the five instincts forget their purpose and are led astray, willing to do anything to fulfill the needs of these instincts. We battle these evils, and not the people who have succumbed to them as Guru Gobind Singh has said.
You say these things because you cannot see past the creation, you are enamoured by the atom, the building blocks of this life and you live subject to them. To truly see how inconsequential this moment, this place is, is a blessing only a few will know. You are consumed by the why's of this place, but if you only for a second knew God, you wouldn't bother with such a trivial thing, as Guru Nanak tells us.


----
----
Line 271: Line 318:
Sikhism only covers prayer and religious obligations. It has no understanding of how to interact with the real world. It has no detailed economic system, social system, or ruling system.
Sikhism only covers prayer and religious obligations. It has no understanding of how to interact with the real world. It has no detailed economic system, social system, or ruling system.


'''Answer'''
Christianity, Islam nor any religion for that matter has an answer for these questions. In fact these questions are redundant, almost as if a child is asking them. For instance you've asked about killing a 'non-sikh'. Sikhs look at all humans as brothers and sisters, so shouldn't you have asked about murder in general? Our moral authority is God, and God's vassal is our conscience, which we through prayer and simran seek to strengthen it. Therefore a developed conscience will answer any and all other questions, in the vanguard of Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love).


Secularism is the only way to truly govern a populace, considering our earthen society consists of many different faiths. So your last point only shows the subjective and divisive, and disruptive nature of your mind and your faith. The only faith that will not only propel our human brotherhood and society into a future where are all understanding, accepting and compassionate of each other is a faith that would risk and sacrifice everything for another's right to believe and practice a faith. Just as Guru Tegh Bahadur did when he and 5 volunteers were tortured and murdered so that hinduism may exist.


----
----
Line 292: Line 342:
If the Gurus are false Prophets, the Scriptures inaccurate, and the concepts and precepts erroneous, then how can Sikhism be used to take life unjustly?  
If the Gurus are false Prophets, the Scriptures inaccurate, and the concepts and precepts erroneous, then how can Sikhism be used to take life unjustly?  


'''ANSWER'''
Here you speak empty factless baseless words. Guru Gobind Singh told Aurengzeb that in the end he had no choice but to take the sword, and only when carried with God in your heart, then it is a righteous act. Sikhs carry a kirpan for the same reason. Not for self defense and not for religious decoration but because if Sikhi is followed properly, your conscience developed and you're emanating Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love) then you have become a moral and temporal protector. And a true Sikh at any time will lay down his or her life to protect the helpless and the innocent, wheresoever they can help them. A kirpan is their tool to remind them of their duty as defenders of the downtrodden, and protectors of the oppressed. An intimation of their constant struggle against kam (Lust), krodh (Rage or uncontrolled anger), lobh (Greed), moh (Attachment or emotional attachment) and ahankar (ego).
There has never been a Sikh war, other than when we defended ourselves against the Mughal empire (Mughal-Sikh Wars) and when we later defended ourselves against the invading british in the Anglo-Sikh Wars.


Any criminal, unjustified, or radical acts actually proven to be committed by true sikhs against innocent people is strictly and vehemently opposed.


----
----
Line 303: Line 358:
Surely, as God, he is outwith all such concepts. To ask how God is “made” is to misunderstand what God is.  
Surely, as God, he is outwith all such concepts. To ask how God is “made” is to misunderstand what God is.  


'''ANSWER'''
Again your weak connection with our creator pervades through your questions. Guru Nanak and all the Guru's who composed hymn's have said that Waheguru is the beginning of all. The created and self created. Meaning there is nothing before the Almighty. There is none who have any control, suggestion, or relation to the Lord.


Your insistence to appeal to your definition of the creation shows that now in this moment, this is all you will know of God's creation. You are trapped and only able to comprehend what your 5 senses display for you. We, our physical shells are subject to the dimensional laws which govern our home. However Paratma and atma itself are not. Therefore God, as stated by all religions, has no limits.


----
----
Line 320: Line 378:
It is incredulous that anything calling itself “the modern religion” still does not emancipate women and give them independence.  
It is incredulous that anything calling itself “the modern religion” still does not emancipate women and give them independence.  


'''ANSWER'''
No current religion has a separation rite. It is noteworthy to know that all religions perform the marriage ceremony with the emphasis on our and in front of our creator. Thus the Lord deals with our meta-physical selves primarily, therefore the Sikh marriage ceremony, the Anand Karaj signifies the union of two souls on this plane of existence and another. With this act complete, the couple are free to continue to propagate our species, but also to further their connection with our creator, together. It is humankind engrossed in the 5 instincts, that cause a marriage to fail. At which point of both parties conceding failure, then legally they may obtain a divorce, whether it is the female that initiates it or the male, there is no difference. Culture, and religion are two separate entities and should be treated as such. Especially considering, the state of indian culture when Guru Nanak was born, understanding how the Guru's evolved a people from the depths at which they were to form such a spiritually pure philosophy followed by millions is a miracle in and of itself.


You speak benightedly of Sikh women not being emancipated. Even when Guru Nanak was born and it was customary to belittle women, and not let them enter religious facilities, among other demeaning things. Yet Guru Nanak, said She who bore Kings and our sons. She who has the gift of life, how could she be less than equal or evil, when without her there would be no life. Guru Nanak emancipated women at least 500 years before it became a recognized cause.


----
----
Line 349: Line 410:
In Sikhs claims that there are “no chosen people”, why must people adhere to Sikhism to be saved? Why must they take the Khalsa ?  
In Sikhs claims that there are “no chosen people”, why must people adhere to Sikhism to be saved? Why must they take the Khalsa ?  


'''ANSWER'''
God does not punish those that do not believe in Sikhism. They who are punished are those who must reenter the mortal coil for the injustices they have exacted upon other innocent beings.


If Sikhs considered others inferior then Guru Tegh Bahadur would not have given up his own life to save another faith. One Which we do not remotely follow. In Sikhi, we constantly battle the 5 instincts, and Guru stresses that the hardest one to overcome is ahankar or ego. That is the case because even after being able to control these instincts and we receive all the benefits of doing so, even after becoming enlightened and unattached to all that can hurt us. We still can fall victim to ego, as that pride of being different and ascended can cause us to look at others differently. However a true sikh will not allow that last instinct to influence one's actions or circumvent the responsibilities they must adhere too. That is why our earthly brotherhood survives and allows for peace between all people no matter the religion or spiritual awakening.
In western society we strive for equality. Yet we have police officers which when necessary we must obey. They have a code they are sworn to uphold, the code of law. This code adheres only to physical action. Therefore there must be a way to guide us in more ways than just physical. That is the meaning of the creation of the Khalsa. They are sworn to protect the rights of all those who are unable to do so themselves.


----
----
Line 358: Line 424:
Is this fair, if it is the truth ( which it is not ), then why do Sikhs not ask others to join it?
Is this fair, if it is the truth ( which it is not ), then why do Sikhs not ask others to join it?


'''ANSWER'''
Sikhs do not think so little or other people and their beliefs. We do not show up at their door to tell them they are sinners. We do not assume they are going to hell because of their faith regardless of how peaceful a person is. We believe when a person has had enough of being force fed answers and beliefs which contradict and confuse, a strong minded person who is able to live up to the tasks of a Sikh, will come searching for the truth. Moreover, understanding the word Sikh, and how the Guru's associated and their demeanour with people of other faiths proves that, whatever one believes or does that makes them closer to our creator, regardless of the label of what that person believes. Makes them a good Sikh. Whatsoever allows for a greater connection to our Lord, and furthermore a more loving and united earthly society makes for a good Sikh. Even if you're a Christian, or a Muslim or a Hindu. Surely as Guru Nanak said, there is no Muslim, there is Hindu. Then there is no Christian. Since Sikh means to learn, and we're all learning then whatever allows to form a union with our creator is the path of a Sikh.
And again you speak as if this moment that you are alive is it. That this is your only chance and that if you fail, then you are relegated to purgatory. Sikhs do not have such a dire view. This creation although awesome, is not the penultimate creation. God is far greater than you can imagine.


True Sikhs are forever engaged in the love of our creator. So strongly so that nothing else matters. All is provided and will be as it may be. As long as we are able to recite the name of our beloved, all is well.


'''Conclusion'''


==External links==
==External links==

Revision as of 01:50, 26 September 2009

If you have any question about Sikhi, click on the discussion tab and put it there. We will try and answer all questions that are put to us as per the guidance provided by Guru Granth Sahib. Thank you - SikhiWiki team

Frequently Asked Questions about Sikhism

Q. Why isn't there a woman Granthi?

A Man or a Woman can perform services of a granthi in a gurdwara. there is no gender bar or any kind of discrimination against any person for becoming a granthi. Sometimes, we do see woman sitting in the service of Holy guru Granth Sahib during Diwan time.

Being a granthi sis very hard and demanding job. it is very difficult for a woman, particularly if she has childern, to serve as a full time granthi. This is a responsibility which requires working during odd hours. During a function, at house of a sikh, a granthis is required early in the morning to arrange for function. She may required to stay there late after a night function and travel alone back to the gurdwara. because of nature of duty, it is usually performed by male sikh. It may often be performed jointly by the husband and the wife. They share this responsibility depending upon the nature n time of the duty

Q. Can Sikhs have tattoos?

A. I don't believe there is anything directly written against or in favour of tattoos in the Sikh scriptures. Tattoos can be grouped with "extreme make-up" which the Guru calls "decorations" and I ask you to read the article Guru Granth Sahib on adornment.

The Guru tells us that "without the remembrance of the Lord, the 'sheegar' (decorations) will bring no happiness or comfort". On the other hand, the Guru says that if one remembers the Lord all the time (ie: "within whose home the Husband Lord abides"), then he or she will be "totally adorned and decorated" by the Lord. So if you live according to the Waheguru's hukam, then you may decorate yourself as you like.

As a summary, the Guru says, "Even though I totally decorated myself, still, my mind was not satisfied. I applied various scented oils to my body, and yet, I did not obtain even a tiny bit of pleasure from this. Within my mind, I hold such a desire, that I may live only to behold my Beloved, O my mother.(1)"

You need to think deeply about why you want a tattoo. Sikhi is more about the mind than just about the body. If you want the tattoo to enhance your ego then you are feeding the five evils within and you should reconsider.

The motivation behind tattoos needs to be considered carefully. There is "no blanket ban" on tattoo as such in Sikhi but one must not do it as it can be perceived as a sign to increase ones ego, which is a negative trait. On the other hand if you already remember God and you want to praise Him by decorating yourself with his reminders, then do it by all means.


Q. Why do Sikhs criticize practices in other religions?

Q. If Sikhism says that there are different paths to God, and everyone has the right to practice their own religion, why do Sikhs criticize practices that may be done in other religions?

A: Sikhi does accept that:

1. Holy books not false: Gurbani tells us: : "Do not say that the Vedas, the Bible and the Koran are false. Those who do not contemplate them are false." (SGGS p1350) It is accepted that the various religious Holy books are not false but that does not mean that the adherents are following the Holy text faithfully. It is clear that in most religions, most devotees are not keeping to their faiths properly.

2. Different paths: The Guru also tells us: "Where have the Hindus and Muslims come from? Who put them on their different paths? Think of this, and contemplate it within your mind....(1)" (SGGS p477)

So it is accepted that God intended for there to be different paths for human salvation, HOWEVER, the Guru has also criticised some of the practises followed by the devotees such as:

3. Fasting & other rituals: : "Fasting, daily rituals, and austere self-discipline - those who keep the practice of these, are rewarded with less than a shell." (SGGS p216)

4. Ceremonial Marks: : "Around your neck is a rosary, and on your forehead is a sacred mark; upon your head is a turban, and you wear two loin cloths. If you knew the nature of God, you would know that all of these beliefs and rituals are in vain." (SGGS p470)

It is clear that the Gurus do not accept that rituals like fasting, circumcision, shaving the head, ceremonial marks, etc will please God even a little bit and so these rituals have always been criticised. The discrimination against women; against lower castes, etc have always been objected to by the Gurus. So when the Sikhs criticise these practises, it because they are unfair EVEN in the original religion but the followers are ignoring the truth of their own religion.

So called Muslims blowing up innocent children; Jews killing masses indiscriminately - Is this preached by their faith leaders - Surely not. So the Sikhs will speak against them. The same applies to Sikhs who do honour killing, bomb air-planes for the creation of Khalistan; etc - The indiscriminate killing of innocent people and the suppression of their right to life and peaceful existence are evils and they that have to be strongly discouraged and stopped wherever possible.

No God-loving person should stand for such stupidity and evil deeds - The Sikh Gurus spoke loudly against these evils and their words are preserved for all to read. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for some of the other religions - their holy text is old and sometimes not well preserved in its entirety.

I hope this gives you some idea why although Sikhism accepts and respects other religions, it does not always accept the practises of the devotees especially ones which have no spiritual or other merit in life.

Q. Why don't Sikhs cut their hair?

A: Sikhs believe that hair or kesh as they call their long hair is an integral part of the human body and hence should not be cut; people are created with long hair for a reason. If one believes in God, then one must accept the "Will of God" or Hukam and the persistent growth of hair on the heads of all humans (except people who go bald!) surely is due to God's Hukam. Long hair or Kesh causes no harm to the person and so the Sikhs see no reason in regularly cutting away hair that is continuously growing. They accept hair as a beautiful part of their bodies. Cutting it is a sign of resistance to God's Hukam. However, Sikhs do not mind if others cut their hair. Many Sikhs called Sehajdhari (slow-adopters) Sikhs do not keep their hair uncut.

Q: Can someone who is not born a Sikh become a Sikh?

A: Yes, Of Course. Anyone who wants, can become a Sikh. It is a religion open to all. The choice has to be made voluntarily and no one is forced or can be forced to become a Sikh. Once a Sikh, one is free to leave Sikhism. There is no automatic curse on someone who leaves Sikhi nor is there any automatic heavenly reward for becoming a Sikh. It is only ones actions, deeds, contributions and thoughts that can determine any outcome in the hereafter!

Q. How do you become a Sikh?

A. Simply by following the path laid down by the Sikh Gurus; by following Gurbani - the words of the Gurus as written in the Sikh holy Granth called the Guru Granth Sahib. You can find the original text and translations in most popular languages on the web. See the article Gurbani online for links to websites.

Before wearing the Guru's bana or uniform and representing the Guru, you will need to understand the Guru's rules. You can only do this if you learn the Guru's basic rules:

Rule 1: Simran and Sewa: Simran is the reciting of Lord's name; read the Mool mantar; learn it; practise it in your life. Remember God; see Him/Her in everyone and everywhere. Study the Japji sahib step by step; learn one pauri or step each week; take your time learn the words; understand the words; understand the meaning; contemplate the words. Do sewa - volunteer free service in the community or for friends or relations; feel good about doing Simran and Sewa; accept it as part of God's way. Find holy Sikh sangat - Other wise Sikh people who follow the path of the Guru. Share Simran and Sewa with them and attend activities together as much as you can. Only keep their company if they take you towards the Guru - If they don't change the sangat until you find the right company.

Rule 2: Three pillars - Guru Nanak formalised three basic guidelines for Sikhs: Naam Japna (focus of God), Kirat Karni (honest living) and Vand Chakna (sharing with others). Read about these and follow them. Naam Japna and Simran are very similar; Listen to Kirtan; understand the words; do kirtan if you can; join in; say the words; understand the meaning; think about what the Guru is saying. See Kirtan websites to download kirtan or go to article - Listen to kirtan to listen, read and sing the Guru's words. Read about history of the Gurus to understand their ways and how their sacrifices are remembered even today.

Rule 3: Make life changes - Start subduing the five evils within. We all have these and we need to restrain them - kam (Lust); krodh (Rage or uncontrolled anger); lobh (Greed); moh (Attachment or emotional attachment) and ahankar (ego). Don't left them control you - You should control them. Also, embrace the Five virtues as ordained by the Gurus - Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love). Make concrete changes in your life and in your attitudes taking these guidelines into account.

Rule 4: Prepare to take Amrit: Start wearing some of the 5Ks, wear Bana, and start looking like a Sikh of the Guru. Only do this if you have the thought of the Guru in your heart. Otherwise the physical gear is just a waste.

Rule 5: Become a Khalsa - Contact a local Gurdwara or another Sikh and arrange to take Khanda-ke-pahul - Guru Gobind Singh's baptism vows.

Q. What are the origins of Sikhism?

A. Sikhism began with the birth of their founder Guru, Guru Nanak in 1469. However, it is generally accepts that Guru Nanak began his formal mission around 1499 A.D, in the northern part of ancient India in the place now called Panjab, which is now divided between Pakistan and India. It originated with the teachings of Guru Nanak who rejected the philosophies pursued by both the indigenous Hindus and Muslims.

Q. Why do Sikhs wear turbans?

A. Sikhs are required to have their hair uncut as ordained by their tenth Guru, Guru Gobind Singh in 1699 as part of the Amrit Sanchar ceremony and the Creation of the Khalsa. It is for this reason, in order to keep the hair tidy and manageable, that the Sikh wear the Turban. The word Turban originating in Persian and used to describe the various scarfs and clothes used to cover the heads of the people indiginous of that area. The term is now used loosely in English functioning as an umbrella term to describe all cloth headdresses. The Dastar is what Sikh people adorn although similiar but an altogether different headdress. Also, it is a tradition of Sikhs and others from the Punjab region of India and Pakistan to cover their head as a matter of respect for elders and spiritual elevated people. It would be a sign of disrespect if one was to enter a Gurdwara's Darbar Sahib with the head uncovered.

Q. Do Sikhs believe in Prayer?

Yes. Prayer is central to Sikhi. The ideals of the Sikh faith advise the devotee to rise early in the morning and meditate on God. Meditation is usually done while sitting comfortably, cross-legged, on the floor. Nitnem is a set of morning, evening, and bedtime prayers which are read or recited daily, while sitting or standing.

Sikhs normally do not say prayers while kneeling as Christians or Catholics do. A formal prayer of supplication, called ardas is very important to Sikhs and is usually offered while standing. Prayer and meditation focuses on praising God, and may take the form of singing, called Kirtan. Sikhs believe Ardas, prayer, kirtan and meditation to be essential in attaining desirable qualities and overcoming ego. Sikh scripture counsels that each breath is an opportunity for prayer.

Guru Arjan wrote: "Twenty-four hours a day, O Nanak, meditate on the Guru, the path to enlightenment." (SGGS p387)

Q. Who is the present religious leader of the Sikhs?

A. During the time of the ten human Gurus, the respective Gurus were the leaders of the Sikhs. Guru Nanak's (1469 - 1539) was followed by nine successors Angad, Amardas, Ramdas, Arjan, Hargobind, Harrai, Harkrishan, Tegh Bahadar and Gobind Singh (1539-1708) who developed and applied the teaching of the founder Guru to the concrete socio-political situations that existed during their time. From 1708 onwards the leader of the Sikhs is their perpetual Guru, Guru Granth Sahib. All guidance and instructions (Hukam) have to be received from the Guru Granth Sahib.

Q.In the Sikh religion what are the 5 ks?

The 5Ks or Kakkars are the 5 articles of faith that are worn by all practising Sikhs. These are:

Q. What is Langar?

Langar or Guru ka Langar is a word that stands for the practise of serving free food to the community. Guru Ka Langar when translated means, a community kitchen run in the name of the Guru by the Sangat. In Sikhism, the institution of langar started with the founder, Guru Nanak himself. Community kitchens came into existence with the sangats (holy congregations) of disciples which sprang up at many places in his time to gather and sing God's praise - kirtan. At these gatherings, it became common to serve food and many travelled from distant places.

Q. What is the significance of Guru ka Langar?

Guru ka Langar signifies the equality of all human beings. Anyone partaking Langar will sit in a pangat or "row" without any distinction of caste or status to eat a common meal prepared in the community kitchen.

Langar is entirely a community effort right from the beginning. The food stuff required is contributed by the Sangat or members of the congregation and the food is prepared and served by Sewadarss - who are volunteers and members of the congregation as well. During the period of the ten Gurus, the Gurus themselves contributed to and participated in this effort.

Guru Amar Das, the third Nanak, firmly established his open free kitchen concept as we see it today and regularly served food to visitors round the clock. The Guru made it obligatory for every visitor to have food in this langar before coming to his presence. The Emperor and the prince, the rich and the poor, the high caste and the low caste, all complied with this requirement. All the Gurus propagated this institution.

Considering that caste discrimination was wide spread in India during those times, in the hands of the Gurus, langar became a powerful means of social reform; one that gave practical expression to the notion of equality.

Q. What do Sikhs believe about God?

A. Some religions, like Christianity, believe in a trinity. Others, such as Hinduism, believe in a multitude of demi-gods. Buddhism teaches the belief in God is unimportant. Sikhism teaches the existence of one God. Guru Nanak taught that the creator and creation are inseparable in the way that an ocean is made up of its individual drops.

The fundamental belief of Sikhism is that God exists, not merely as an idea or concept, but as a Real Entity, indescribable yet knowable and perceivable to anyone who is prepare to dedicate the time and energy to become perceptive to His persona. The Gurus never spoke about proofs of the existence of God: For them He is too real and obvious to need any logical proof.

Guru Arjan, Nanak V, says, "God is beyond colour and form, yet His presence is clearly visible" (SGGS 74), and again, "Nanak's Lord transcends the world as well as the scriptures of the east and the west, and yet he is clearly manifest" (SGGS 397).

In any case, knowledge of the ultimate Reality is not a matter for reason; it comes by revelation of Himself through "nadir" or grace and by "anubhava" or mystical experience. Says Guru Nanak, "budhi pathi na paiai bahu chaturaiai bhai milai mani bhane" which translates to "He is not accessible through intellect, or through mere scholarship or cleverness at argument; He is met, when He pleases, through devotion" (SGGS 436).

Q. What do Sikhs believe about Creation?

Christianity teaches that God created Earth in seven days about 6,000 year ago. Guru Nanak wrote that God’s creation consisted of a multitude of universes, and that no one knew for certain how, or when, creation took place.

Guru Granth Sahib states that, “There are planets, solar systems and galaxies. If one speaks of them, there is no limit, no end. There are worlds upon worlds of His Creation. As He commands, so they exist. He watches over all, and contemplating the creation, He rejoices. Nanak says, to describe this is as hard as steel!” (SGGS p8)

The scriptures say that the universe consists of many different bodies including planets, solar systems galaxies, stars, suns, skies, etc and that the scale and extent of these bodies is unknown and that there is no end to their number. It is clear from this that probable size of the universe is beyond an exact evaluation or calculation by the human mind.

The holy text continues to state: "The limits of the created universe cannot be perceived. Its limits here and beyond cannot be perceived. Many struggle to know His limits, but His limits cannot be found. No one can know these limits. The more you say about them, the more there still remains to be said." (SGGS p5).

Q. Why do women sit separately?

In a Gurdwara, why do women sit on one side and men on the other? Isn't this discrimination? or at least segregation?

Sikhism is not a sexist religion nor does it discriminate against women. This is a matter of personal choice. It is just that when in a place of worship in a community environment, people prefer to sit with members of their own gender. It is not wrong for men to sit with the women in the Gurdwara, or vice versa - it is just uncommon in western nations, although in India in some places, there is no custom of sitting separately especially in villages, etc. When families visit Gurdwaras, they do generally sit together.

Q. Are women allowed to be 'priests'

In most religions, women are not allowed to be 'priests'; What is the position in Sikhism?

Sikhism sees both men and women as equals, so there is no restriction for women; women can perform all the duties that a man can, as far as religious responsibilities are concerned.

Q. Is the use of alcohol permitted in Sikhism?

No. Sikhism does not allow the use of alcohol or any other intoxicants for leisure use. "Those who are deluded by sensual pleasures, are tempted by sexual delights and enjoy wine are corrupt." (SGGS p335) and also, "Drinking wine, his intelligence departs, and madness enters his mind; he cannot distinguish between his own and others, and he is struck down by his Lord and Master." (SGGS p)

Q. What's in a Sikh name?

Every Sikh child is given a name after birth in a ceremony called Naam karan. Normally, the names are picked up in the presence of Sri Guru Granth Sahib. The sacred scripture is opened at random and a name is picked starting with the first letter of the first word from the top left or the first letter of the Hukamnama. Sikh males bear the appellation of 'Singh' and females 'Kaur', after their first names. The word 'Singh' means lion, and 'Kaur' means princess/lioness.

All the Singhs and Kaurs may not in fact be Sikhs. The Rajputs and Gurkhas also use these names. This appellation helped the Sikhs to become a caste-less fraternity. It infused a martial spirit in the community.

In some parts of the world, Sikh males are called 'Sardar Ji' (Chief) and females are called 'Sardarni Ji'. This designation is attached to the front of the name. Some Sikhs may also put the village name from whence they came as a suffix.

Youngsters do not call parents or persons older than themselves by first name.

Q. Do Sikhs believe in fasting?

Fasts are not given any importance in Sikhism. Compulsory fasts for religious reasons or on certain days do not carry any weight with Sikhism. Fasts for the purpose of maintaining good health (dieting, etc.) can be observed. "I do not keep fasts, nor do I observe the month of Ramadaan. I serve only the One, who will protect me in the end. (1)" Guru Arjan Dev (SGGS p)

1. Is Guru Nanak a False Prophet?

Guru Nanak Dev was born in Punjab, India, on 20 October 1469, to a Hindu family. By the time of his death on 22 September 1539, according to Sikh Scriptures ( more of which later ) , he had “millions” of followers.

Now, Guru Nanak never claimed to be a prophet in his lifetime. However, if the scriptures of the Sikh religion are to be believed, he believed himself to be inspired from God, and to bring teachings of God. For example :-

“There is no Muslim, there is no Hindu”

"One who recognizes the One Lord among all beings does not talk of ego.”

These are clear atonements, meant to inspire and motivate Sikhs and non-Sikhs to alter their lives and live according to Sikhism. Sikhs often claim that the Guru’s were merely teachers, or guides, and were not Prophets.

However, if we consult the linguistic definition of Prophet, we discover the following meanings of the term :-

“A person who speaks by divine inspiration or as the interpreter through whom the will of a god is expressed.”

“someone who speaks by divine inspiration; someone who is an interpreter of the will of God”

“a person regarded as, or claiming to be, an inspired teacher or leader”

Therefore, whenever anyone claims to speak on behalf of God, rationally and linguistically that person is considered to be claiming Prophethood.

When a person claims Prophethood, this claim must then be verified. Prophets throughout history have brought miracles to demonstrate to their people ( Moses, Abraham, David, and Others, may peace be upon them all ) . For example Moses spilt the Red Sea, David was able to melt metal in his hands, and Abraham was able to withstand fire. These miracles have been verified both through scriptures and through science.

There are also many false Prophets. These have included David Icke , Mirza Ghulam Ahmad , and many others.

By Sikhs refusing to acknowledge that Guru Nanak was claiming to be a Prophet, they sidestep this issue. This is in order to avoid any means of principles of falsification, in order to confirm or disprove the Guru’s “Prophethood”.

ANSWER There is no proof that biblical accounts occurred, the great flood, nor the parting. Although the Quran, the Bible and the Torah all mention Moses, they each have different views and accounts of his life over 2000 years ago. Nor is there a rule that all prophets must be verified as you claim. Guru Nanak was neither a teacher nor a prophet. He carried within him a divine light. Seeing the world for what it is, he endured to allow others to be blessed with Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love). So everyone could be blessed with Dharam, and Gian. He was alike all saints that had experienced enlightenment and salvation except that we aimed to share this gift with others. Guru Granth Sahib contains verses composed by saints of other faiths, proving that salvation is not a right of those adhering to a certain religion. But for those who radiate love due to a way of life, and a philosophy of truth. Unbound by religious domination and incoherent guidelines, and unrestricted from the invisible borderlines we've cast on the Earth.

Guru Nanak made 5 Udasis (journeys) and everywhere he went and every person he met had their life changed. This proof is found when you research Sikh Gurdwaras, most people expect beautiful structures like Harimandir Sahib or Anandpur Sahib, what you will find however is that Guru Nanak in just a moment, in one discussion, changed the lives of shopkeepers and people in simple homes to independently choose to serve their creator. Converting their home or shop into a Gurdwara, serving langar (free food for all) and a place to sing the praises of Waheguru. As for miracles, there were many, such as the boulder in Panja Sahib, or during Guru Nanak's imprisonment. There are countless stories, but the Guru nor the students of Sikhi rely on rating and judging the extent of the miracles at that time or in the present. The Guru's message was clear and it was potent and it was powerful. Enough to transform lives and bring elements of the divine light to anyone who wishes to experience it.

The two largest religions of Earth, Islam and Christianity. Are the oldest religions, stemming from Moses' interactions with God. Both teach that they are the only way to be "saved". Both inherently instruct their followers to create their 'brotherhood' apart of the brotherhood that binds us all, of humanity. It teaches segregation and to reserve pity for the fellow humans who have not been "saved". This single element is the primal cause of war and responsible for the deaths of untold millions of people, and further will forever cause humanity to subjugate itself.



2. Are the Sikh Scriptures authentic?

In order for anyone to follow Gods teachings, one must be sure, with absolute certainty and without doubt, that the teachings they are following are authentic. Sikhism has a number of scriptures which they claim are written by Gurus ( and therefore divinely inspired ). However, these scriptures can be proven to have no historical or authentic basis.

A. the Janamsakhi

Sikhs claim that the Bhai Bala Janamsakhi was written by Bala Sandhu, a disciple of Guru Nanak. However, Guru Angad, the next Guru in succession, had never heard of Bala Sandhu. In addition to this, Bala Sandhu is not mentioned by Bhai Gurdas. How can Guru Nanaks closest confidants and disciples not know Bala Sandhu?

There are a number of other errors. For example, the rhythmic prose used in the verse was written by the third and fifth Guru’s, so how can this be present chronologically earlier? Also, the language used was not even present in society for over 100 years after the death of Guru Nanak.

How can it be that a divinely inspired work, detailing the life of the Guru, can be so inaccurate?

ANSWER Your statements are baseless, and there is no distinct facts that prove what you say. Most Sikh history comes from the archives of the Mughal Empire which ruled for near a thousand years. The most relevant duration also known as the Classic period started with Babar and ended with Aurangzeb, about 1400-1700. From these accounts we know the exact dates of the interactions and developments of Sikhism. Which at the time was not an organized religion, it unified later culminating at Vaisakhi in 1699. The Guru's after Guru Nanak were chosen by divine intervention, to complete a new way of life, an understanding for the people. As proven that from 1469 to 1708, a new philosophy was created and within that came a new language, culture, music, martial art, a moral code, and a legal jurisdiction among other things.

Not all the 10 Guru's composed spiritual hymns, each one had their individual missions to complete Sikhi. Considering that Guru's never allowed their physical forms to be sketched in any way, nor even their hymns to be named (as noted by some compostion's titled Mahala). The closest identifying trait is the composition stating it was the divine light in its various incarnation.)

Therefore all the questions you pose are completely baseless and have no historical fact attributed to it. These "errors" that you speak of are just your attempt to create a discrepancy where there is none. Sikh history is only 500 years only and very easy to research. A better question to ask would be why the gospel of Luke contradicts the old testament. Or why the Bible, book of Mormon and the King James Bible disaffirm one another.

B.The Guru Granth Sahib Ji

Sikhs claim that this book is the “Eleventh” and final Guru, and should be regarded and revered as a Guru. There is even a tale of this book, upon compilation, to be given its own bed whilst a Guru, Guru Arjan slept on the floor!

For this book to be the 11th Guru, the final way to God and scripture in its own right, surely it would have to be a perfect book, free from errors and contradictions? However, we find that this is not the case. Some errors include :-

   * Teaching God to be “Sargun” (Possessing Attributes) and “Nargun” ( Possessing no Attributes).
   * Claims there is only one way to God, then says many ways
   * Reincarnation is taught in one section, yet is rejected elsewhere

How can it be that a Divinely inspired book, a Guru, a way to God, be so full of contradictions? In addition to this, the Book provides no details of the origins of the Earth or of Man, and provides no answers to “where did we come from” as a result. Surely any divinely inspired text would present Gods answer to these questions?

Answer: It would appear that you are not conversant with the Guru's Shabad, hence your statement. Please seek advice from a Gaini who is fully conversant and understands the Guru's Shabad and he will clarify any doubts in your mind if you are a Sikh. If follow another religion, please read more about Sikhism or speak to someone who is knowledgeable about Sikhi. This is a weakness in mankind, always trying to find faults because a lack of understanding. This is what is known as ‘Mann Matth’ (‘I know better than anyone else’). But the Guru can never be wrong. It would appear that you have been misguided by your own interpretation, but are you fully familiarised with the Guru’s dialog? Sometimes the Shabad is written in different context to what you may interpret. Waheguru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ke Fateh.

ANSWER Your statement points out your unfamiliarity with not just Sikhi but most importantly your lack of a relationship with God, our Creator.

Waheguru IS sargun and nirgun. God IS everywhere but nowhere, Our Creator HAS a million forms but has none.

Guru Nanak said, trying to approximate Waheguru is a foolish attempt. One who truly sees, one who truly meets God, will be in awe, and in that bliss will be unable to explain the experience. They can relate certain things, events. But to describe the Creator, their task can never be completed.

The Guru's who composed hymns, did so to espouse the glory of God, the true beauty experienced beyond our 5 sensory inputs. And listening to these Gurbani compositions puts the human listening in the same harmony as those whom elations at meeting the true lord causes their souls to sing. That when experienced, the pure love emanating will cause other souls to vibrate in the same manner.

In truth there are many ways to God. But regardless at the pinnacle of each, all those who attain enlightenment and salvation will have commonalities. As proven by the Sufi Saint Kabir, Guru Nanak and Bhagat Ravi Das. All who grew up being taught various rituals and opposing sides of worship. However, at their ascension their lives were changed, they shed human attachments and many aspects of their radiance while unique are similiar to each other.(Read their histories to understand more about their lives) Because when one truly feels their love for God and God's love for the person, that union is in and of itself a new distinction, a new form of being. a being free of maya, understanding this world play, this atomic drama and in constant vibration with the heavens.

Reincarnation is not rejected in "other sections". The cycle is also known as a "hell" in virtue of the separation of the atma from the Parmatma.

Why most God answer all your questions? Especially in written form. Must Waheguru complete an essay, a thesis on why God created this creation and also then tell you why you must feel love for God before you indulge or bestow your love graciously? I can tell you that the true journey we all share is an attempt to negate duality. For whatever reason our soul is trapped in this shell. With our body reacting to our 5 sensory inputs with kam (Lust), krodh (Rage or uncontrolled anger), lobh (Greed), moh (Attachment or emotional attachment) and ahankar (ego) and the soul responding with Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love). Choosing the right path and eclipsing duality will us to grow and develop, while educating us and enhancing our conscience. Which is exactly what Sikh means. A student, on a quest to expand our conscience. With Waheguru's blessing will we truly understand right and wrong while moving closer to a union with the one that made us.


3. How can Re-Incarnation be Accurate?

In Sikhism, it is the belief that through righteous deeds one achieves salvation, and a “oneness” with God. The main method of this is through “karma”, or the reward of your efforts in this life being rewarded in the next, and so on and so on until spiritual union with God is achieved.

Though this sounds like a nirvana of sorts, it is completely non-sensical. Reincarnation cannot possibly be true as :-

  1. How can the world be in decline, when spiritual karma is meant to increase and improve the world? What is the source for evil originally? Who was the original evildoer according to Sikhism, and which sent a perpetual evil through the earth, increasing its trials?
  2. There is no justice in re-incarnation, as you become a new entity, with no recollection of a past life. Therefore, it is the entity that is being unfairly punished, and not you.
  3. Why are there more bodies on earth now, than there was before? Where do these new Souls emerge from?


Re-incarnation is therefore absurd, and cannot be correct because it does not agree with rationality.

ANSWER There is no global scale of evil and morality to measure this "decline".

You speak as if this creation is the ONLY creation and that this place is our permanent home. Yet every second of every day beings come and go from this place. "Spiritual Karma" is not meant to do anything. It is simply the set of rules, the code that a soul is bound by. Like a child who makes mistakes, steals and once older regrets the crimes so does the soul. Our justice is doled out on a scale unimaginable by mere human minds. Most people believe that a perpetual self exists within themselves, the soul. A body can be judged and tried for crimes in a human court for a crime. However to coalesce all deeds which originally result from the improper choice of action heeded by duality, would put the soul on trial for all it's actions. The penance would be carried out based on the scale of exact right and wrong. Since most are doubtless of their belief in their undying true self, there must be guidelines for it to adhere too. In this cycle of life, within this creation, this is the system that all must face, for all their crimes whether or not tried or rehabilitated by our judicial system. Aurengzeb himself wrote that he feared what he would say in the court of the Lord as he was ashamed of the actions of his life.

There is no primal Evil one. One who can challenge God does not exist. Thinking othewise, regardless of the back story is disrespectful and belittling of the Creator.

The sentence of rebirth is in fact the truest form of justice. If you understand Sikhi you would know that Guru Nanak said, even a King is lower than an ant whom in it's mind never forgets it's creator. When we are free of the vessel in this creation, the soul is aware of all it's transgressions and actions, from it's inception to it's history of lives. And each vessel has it's own ways of interaction with the creation and it is limited to that. Such as a human without sight or another sense or even someone with an impairment. Humanity is the only form whereby our difference in instinct and free will can be expressed. Reincarnated into an ant, we are aware of all that we have experienced and as such have nothing but awe for God, but we serve out our purpose, reacting on pure instinct, aware of but unable to emote and fulfilling the principle of the creature's role in the creation. While we serve out our penance until we can achieve a human birth, and try once more to balance out our karmic scale, in an effort to be better.

True, there are more humans than before. Although this is an absurd statement as no one can know the will of our Creator, you would do better to ask God the question of why there are more humans now. But to provide you with something to sustain your curiosity; why are there less animals? and less trees? With global deforestation and more and more animals on the endangered list perhaps those souls now embody a different species of life and have found home in humankind. Regardless these are the questions answerable only by the one who presents the conundrum. But what this question you pose uncovers is something more unveiling. The primal Why. Why must "GOD" provide you with all the answers you seek. It only makes sense that each individual person would receive gian, understanding as they each are fit to understand it.

If this is the pinnacle of creation and you are the penultimate being, why do you not already know? Why do you subsequently die, while this world is filled with good and bad and the evanescense of life sustaining you, the departing transient? Until you find tranquility in the question "why?", and the contentment of your being, you will never transcend, you will never be able to accept truth. Instead be haunted by fear of the unknown hoping someone will come to give you the answers, at which point you will believe anything written before you that claims it as such. Those that take the easy path, the quick journey to seek answers will not find truth, will instead be beguiled by false claims.



4. How can God be Omnipotent and within Evil?

For Sikhs to state that God is “all pervading and is in all directions. God is omniscient, omnipotent and loves all”, what does that mean?

Firstly how can God be in everything? Would God be in Impure things such as Excreta?

Secondly, how can God be within everyone? What is the point, according to Sikhism, of trying to attain Union with God, when God is already within us according to their scriptures? How can God be within people and objects which are intrinsically evil?

Answer Again your relationship with God is revealed with the questions you ask, especially this one.

In this creation, the 'world ocean' which we are all drowning in, God is everywhere. God exists in every nucleus of every atom. You look at this creation simply as a planet on which you live. Yet Waheguru has made not only with planet, this solar system, this universe, and even this entire dimension, but there is so much more. You are entrapped by the confines of your senses, and now believe that a true existence can only be one that includes your 5 ways to manipulate and experience your life on this planet. Know that our creator has made a drama of atoms, one that we are entranced by. So eluded are we with the experience of only the 5 senses available to us we do not even begin to think of much greater God can be. I can only give you these simple examples, because again, gian is blessed upon those who are ready for it, we each each a song in the same physical manner, yet each of us have favourite songs. Scientists have yet to figure out why certain people recite a song over and over again. Unable to develop an algorithm to explain of the phenomena of favourites. The same applies to how people see. Although the physical process is the same for everyone, some people see the true beauty of an object.

God is within us, and everything. Everything in this creation. But that doesn't mean you are in God's grace. Just the same that you may be physically close to someone, but are not emotionally close.

Also no one is evil. People who are consumed by the five instincts forget their purpose and are led astray, willing to do anything to fulfill the needs of these instincts. We battle these evils, and not the people who have succumbed to them as Guru Gobind Singh has said.

You say these things because you cannot see past the creation, you are enamoured by the atom, the building blocks of this life and you live subject to them. To truly see how inconsequential this moment, this place is, is a blessing only a few will know. You are consumed by the why's of this place, but if you only for a second knew God, you wouldn't bother with such a trivial thing, as Guru Nanak tells us.


5. How can Sikhs claim to have a complete way of Life?

Sikhism is claimed to be a complete way of life, but Sikhism does not have the answers from their scriptures for the following questions :-

  1. How much tax should I pay in a Sikh State, as a Non-Sikh?
  2. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding testimony in a court?
  3. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the sentence for stealing?
  4. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding the age of maturity?
  5. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding my relations with my neighbour?
  6. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding how I should treat an animal?
  7. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding lawful earnings?
  8. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding killing a non-Sikh and the punishment for that?
  9. What is the ruling in Sikhism regarding riding a horse?
 10. What is the ruling in Sikhism if I use a nuclear weapon?

Sikhism only covers prayer and religious obligations. It has no understanding of how to interact with the real world. It has no detailed economic system, social system, or ruling system.

Answer Christianity, Islam nor any religion for that matter has an answer for these questions. In fact these questions are redundant, almost as if a child is asking them. For instance you've asked about killing a 'non-sikh'. Sikhs look at all humans as brothers and sisters, so shouldn't you have asked about murder in general? Our moral authority is God, and God's vassal is our conscience, which we through prayer and simran seek to strengthen it. Therefore a developed conscience will answer any and all other questions, in the vanguard of Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love).

Secularism is the only way to truly govern a populace, considering our earthen society consists of many different faiths. So your last point only shows the subjective and divisive, and disruptive nature of your mind and your faith. The only faith that will not only propel our human brotherhood and society into a future where are all understanding, accepting and compassionate of each other is a faith that would risk and sacrifice everything for another's right to believe and practice a faith. Just as Guru Tegh Bahadur did when he and 5 volunteers were tortured and murdered so that hinduism may exist.


6. What is a Just War in Sikhism?

Sikhism is often presented as a peaceful, non-violent religion. However, it has a concept of Dharam Yudh, which is loosely translated as “Just War”. In this, Sikhs believe that war can be initiated as a last option, and the motivation cannot be revenge.

When we see this in practice however, we can see that very rarely has a Sikh War been any different to any other war fought on behalf of misguided religions : For Land, Nation and Resources.

Examples of this include :-

   * The forceful passing of a resolution to cede Water and Electricity Boards to Punjab Control in the region
   * The murder of Indian Police officers in 1982 – 1983, in revenge
   * Bhindrandales Murder of two nirinkari Gurus in 1981
   * Bombing of Cinemas in Delhi in 2005
   * Bombing of Air India Flight 182

Most people will realise that these examples cited appear far from “Just”. Often, they appear to target civilians. If such action is justified according to these principles, then on what basis?

If the Gurus are false Prophets, the Scriptures inaccurate, and the concepts and precepts erroneous, then how can Sikhism be used to take life unjustly?

ANSWER Here you speak empty factless baseless words. Guru Gobind Singh told Aurengzeb that in the end he had no choice but to take the sword, and only when carried with God in your heart, then it is a righteous act. Sikhs carry a kirpan for the same reason. Not for self defense and not for religious decoration but because if Sikhi is followed properly, your conscience developed and you're emanating Sat (Truth), Santokh (Contentment), Daya (Compassion), Nimrata (Humility) and Pyare (Love) then you have become a moral and temporal protector. And a true Sikh at any time will lay down his or her life to protect the helpless and the innocent, wheresoever they can help them. A kirpan is their tool to remind them of their duty as defenders of the downtrodden, and protectors of the oppressed. An intimation of their constant struggle against kam (Lust), krodh (Rage or uncontrolled anger), lobh (Greed), moh (Attachment or emotional attachment) and ahankar (ego).

There has never been a Sikh war, other than when we defended ourselves against the Mughal empire (Mughal-Sikh Wars) and when we later defended ourselves against the invading british in the Anglo-Sikh Wars.

Any criminal, unjustified, or radical acts actually proven to be committed by true sikhs against innocent people is strictly and vehemently opposed.


7. How can God Create himself?

According to Guru Nanak Dev, he claims that “God himself told me that he is self-created”.

How can God be subject to laws and constraints of his own creation? Concepts such as time, form, shape, etc, are constructs of God. As an unlimited entity, how can God be subject to limited constraints, such as “creating”.

Surely, as God, he is outwith all such concepts. To ask how God is “made” is to misunderstand what God is.

ANSWER Again your weak connection with our creator pervades through your questions. Guru Nanak and all the Guru's who composed hymn's have said that Waheguru is the beginning of all. The created and self created. Meaning there is nothing before the Almighty. There is none who have any control, suggestion, or relation to the Lord.

Your insistence to appeal to your definition of the creation shows that now in this moment, this is all you will know of God's creation. You are trapped and only able to comprehend what your 5 senses display for you. We, our physical shells are subject to the dimensional laws which govern our home. However Paratma and atma itself are not. Therefore God, as stated by all religions, has no limits.


8. Why can Sikh women not Divorce?

Sikhism still does not give the right of divorce to its adherents except in extreme circumstances, and even then since it is not legislated within Sikhism this is decided by Western or Hindu Courts.

This is mentioned in many sources, and some quotes from Sikhs are as follows :-

“In the case of broken marriage, divorce is not possible according to the Sikh religious tradition. The couple can, however, obtain a divorce under the Civil law of the land.”

Of more concern is how Sikhs refuse to even consider divorce, leaving the spouse trapped in a loveless marriage. Take this example from the Sikh Spectrum Magazine :-

When two souls become one, there is no duality between the way a husband and a wife think. Whatever they do, they do it together. A divorce, in such a case, is inconceivable.

It is incredulous that anything calling itself “the modern religion” still does not emancipate women and give them independence.

ANSWER No current religion has a separation rite. It is noteworthy to know that all religions perform the marriage ceremony with the emphasis on our and in front of our creator. Thus the Lord deals with our meta-physical selves primarily, therefore the Sikh marriage ceremony, the Anand Karaj signifies the union of two souls on this plane of existence and another. With this act complete, the couple are free to continue to propagate our species, but also to further their connection with our creator, together. It is humankind engrossed in the 5 instincts, that cause a marriage to fail. At which point of both parties conceding failure, then legally they may obtain a divorce, whether it is the female that initiates it or the male, there is no difference. Culture, and religion are two separate entities and should be treated as such. Especially considering, the state of indian culture when Guru Nanak was born, understanding how the Guru's evolved a people from the depths at which they were to form such a spiritually pure philosophy followed by millions is a miracle in and of itself.

You speak benightedly of Sikh women not being emancipated. Even when Guru Nanak was born and it was customary to belittle women, and not let them enter religious facilities, among other demeaning things. Yet Guru Nanak, said She who bore Kings and our sons. She who has the gift of life, how could she be less than equal or evil, when without her there would be no life. Guru Nanak emancipated women at least 500 years before it became a recognized cause.


9. How can Sikhs Claim that there are “many paths to God”, then he Punishes those whom do not adhere to Sikhism ?

It is claimed Sikhism is non-discriminatory, and that everyone should love each other as human beings, with no-one having a variable status, no-one being “high or low”. His statement is as follows :-

“In Sikhism everyone is equal. All people of different colour, religion, caste, creed, race and sex are equal in the eyes of God. No one is high or low. All are children of God created by God and God loves them all.”

However, the Guru’s own teachings portray a different version of events. :-

Favouring of those in Khalsa

Khalsa is the baptizing of Sikhs, who take an Oath to promote and preserve the five Ks of Sikhism. These Sikhs are to be considered to hold a higher status over that of ordinary persons, and thereby this exposes a hierarchical system. Quotations regarding this brotherhood include :-

“he who recognises the One God and no pilgrimages, alms-giving, non-destruction of life, penances, or austerities; and in whose heart the light of the Perfect One shines, - he is to be recognised as a pure member of the Khalsa”

Thereby, if we are to believe this Guru, and by proxy the beliefs of Sikhism itself, then God, through the Gurus, considered those persons inferior whom :-

         * Engage in Pilgrimages
         * Fasts
         * Worships Idols

Are thereby considered inferior in Gods eyes (according to the Gurus).

In addition to this, those who eat meat, those that cut their hair, and many other tenets of Sikh faith that are violated, God will punish them through re-incarnation, even though these people are also following a path (as they perceive it ) to God.

In Sikhs claims that there are “no chosen people”, why must people adhere to Sikhism to be saved? Why must they take the Khalsa ?

ANSWER God does not punish those that do not believe in Sikhism. They who are punished are those who must reenter the mortal coil for the injustices they have exacted upon other innocent beings.

If Sikhs considered others inferior then Guru Tegh Bahadur would not have given up his own life to save another faith. One Which we do not remotely follow. In Sikhi, we constantly battle the 5 instincts, and Guru stresses that the hardest one to overcome is ahankar or ego. That is the case because even after being able to control these instincts and we receive all the benefits of doing so, even after becoming enlightened and unattached to all that can hurt us. We still can fall victim to ego, as that pride of being different and ascended can cause us to look at others differently. However a true sikh will not allow that last instinct to influence one's actions or circumvent the responsibilities they must adhere too. That is why our earthly brotherhood survives and allows for peace between all people no matter the religion or spiritual awakening.

In western society we strive for equality. Yet we have police officers which when necessary we must obey. They have a code they are sworn to uphold, the code of law. This code adheres only to physical action. Therefore there must be a way to guide us in more ways than just physical. That is the meaning of the creation of the Khalsa. They are sworn to protect the rights of all those who are unable to do so themselves.


10. Why is Sikhism Not Evangelical?

If Sikhism is Gods religion, which is the destiny of all if they are to be saved, and the only way to enlightenment ( as Sikhs perceive it ) is to follow the “Way of the Gurus”, then why do Sikhs not debate and discuss their faith in the World and try to convert others to it?

Is this fair, if it is the truth ( which it is not ), then why do Sikhs not ask others to join it?

ANSWER Sikhs do not think so little or other people and their beliefs. We do not show up at their door to tell them they are sinners. We do not assume they are going to hell because of their faith regardless of how peaceful a person is. We believe when a person has had enough of being force fed answers and beliefs which contradict and confuse, a strong minded person who is able to live up to the tasks of a Sikh, will come searching for the truth. Moreover, understanding the word Sikh, and how the Guru's associated and their demeanour with people of other faiths proves that, whatever one believes or does that makes them closer to our creator, regardless of the label of what that person believes. Makes them a good Sikh. Whatsoever allows for a greater connection to our Lord, and furthermore a more loving and united earthly society makes for a good Sikh. Even if you're a Christian, or a Muslim or a Hindu. Surely as Guru Nanak said, there is no Muslim, there is Hindu. Then there is no Christian. Since Sikh means to learn, and we're all learning then whatever allows to form a union with our creator is the path of a Sikh.

And again you speak as if this moment that you are alive is it. That this is your only chance and that if you fail, then you are relegated to purgatory. Sikhs do not have such a dire view. This creation although awesome, is not the penultimate creation. God is far greater than you can imagine.

True Sikhs are forever engaged in the love of our creator. So strongly so that nothing else matters. All is provided and will be as it may be. As long as we are able to recite the name of our beloved, all is well.


External links