Bhang: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(layout of shabads)
No edit summary
Line 161: Line 161:


''http://www.amritworld.com/bhang.html''
''http://www.amritworld.com/bhang.html''
===Shabads connected with marijuana===
{{Srigranth|1377|58738|
<big>ਕਬੀਰ ਭਾਂਗ ਮਾਛ੝ਲੀ ਸ੝ਰਾ ਪਾਨਿ ਜੋ ਜੋ ਪ੝ਰਾਨੀ ਖਾਂਹਿ ॥</big><br>
kabeer bhaaNg maachhulee suraa paan jo jo paraanee khaaNhi. <br>
Kabeer, those mortals who consume marijuana, fish and wine <br><br>
<big>ਤੀਰਥ ਬਰਤ ਨੇਮ ਕੀਝ ਤੇ ਸਭੈ ਰਸਾਤਲਿ ਜਾਂਹਿ ॥੨੩੩॥</big><br>
tirath barat naym kee-ay tay sabhai rasaatal jaaNhi. ॥233॥<br>
- no matter what pilgrimages, fasts and rituals they follow, they will all go to hell. ॥233॥}}


[[category:articles]]
[[category:articles]]

Revision as of 16:20, 14 August 2007

The ‘Sukhnidhaan’ or ‘Bhang’ (cannabis)

By Bhai Amrit Pal Singh ‘Amrit’ from www.amritworld.com


According to the 'Sikh Rehat Maryada', "A Sikh must not take hemp (cannabis), opium, liquor, tobacco, in short any intoxicant. His only routine intake should be food".

At Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji (one of the five seats of power in the Sikh Panth), the 'Sukhnidhaan' is offered as a holy food. Generally, 'Bhang' (Cannabis) is called 'Sukhnidhaan, but seeing condemnation of 'Bhang' in the Gurbaani and in the Panthic 'Sikh Rehat Maryada', those in favour for the consumption of Bhang have named it 'Sukhnidhaan', instead of 'Bhang'. Whatever is the case, we have to accept that 'Sukhnidhaan' is a drink, in which 'Bhang' (cannabis) too is mixed.


In his book 'Sri Hazoori Maryada Prabodh', Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji, then the “chief priest” of Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji, has expressed his views about 'Bhang' under the heading of 'Sukhnidhaan De Bhog Baare' (page 257 to 264). He wrote that all the 'Maryada', which is being followed at Takht Sahib, is 'Puraatan' (old) tradition.


Supporting the offerings of 'Sukhnidhaan' at Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji, Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji presented the following arguments: -


1. According to the 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala', the Mughul King ‘Babur’ offered 'Bhang' to Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji. Delighted on this, it is claimed that Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji granted him the boon to have the kingdom for seven generations. Guru Ji recited a 'Shabad' (divine hymn) also on this occasion, in which it is argued he did not condemn 'Bhang'. On the other hand, when Yogi Jhangar Naath offered a cup of wine to Guru Nanak Dev Ji, Guru Ji recited a 'Shabad', in which drinking wine and alcohol was condemned.


2. The 'Mahant' (abbot) of 'Gurusar Satlaani' Gurdwara obtained a license for 'Sukhnidhaan' from the British government.


3. 'Sukhnidhaan' is being offered at Sri Amritsar Sahib, Taran-taaran, and Sri Anandpur Sahib Ji.


4. 'Nihangs' (Vanguards in the Sikh Panth) of the 'Budhha Dal' offer 'Sukhnidhaan'.


5. There is description of 'Sukhnidhaan' on many pages of the book 'Sooraj Prakaash'.


6. At 'Shaheedi Baag' in the city of Sri Anandpur Sahib, a small room, which was constructed during Guru's time, has been excavated, in which there were big 'Suneharas' (a kind of big vessel). Apparently it proves that 'Sukhnidhaan' was prepared and offered during the time of Guru Sahib.


7. According to the book 'Khalsa Dharam Shaastar', Guru Gobind Singh ordered to take intoxicants to remove sadness. The quantity of 'Chhatar-dhara' (opium) and 'Sukhnidhaan' was fixed.


8. All the 'Rehats' (codes of conducts) can be known only from the Guru’s history and 'Rehatnamas'. It is claimed that we cannot know 'Rehats' from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.


Let us now discuss these points one by one: -


The main argument by Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji, from Hazoor Sahib, is that Mughal King Babur offered 'Bhang' to Guru Nanak Dev Ji, according to 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala'. Pleased by this, Guru Nanak Dev Ji granted him the boon to have the kingdom for seven generations. Singh Sahib Ji says that Guru Ji recited a 'Shabad' also on this occasion, in which he did not condemn 'Bhang'. On the other hand, when Yogi Jhangar Naath offered a cup of wine to Guru Nanak Dev Ji, Guru Ji recited a 'Shabad', in which drinking wine and alcohol was condemned.


Quoting to the 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala', Singh Sahib Ji made it clear, in a way, that 'Sukhnidhaan' and 'Bhang' are one and the same. The particular 'Saakhi' (narration) of 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala' does not use the word 'Sukhnidhaan'. The word 'Bhang' has only been used.


It is absolutely opposite to the fact saying that according to 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala', Guru Ji was pleased when Babur offered him 'Bhang'. In fact, though it says in 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala' that Babur offered 'Bhang' to Guru Ji, but there is no mention that this “pleased Guru Ji”. Instead, Guru Ji was pleased when Babur released innocent prisoners.


'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala' states that Babur heard Guru Nanak Dev Ji sing the shabad:

  'kuraasaan kasmaanaa keeaa hindustaan daraaeiaa.'
  “Having attacked Khuraasaan, Baabar terrified Hindustan…” (Ang 360, SGGS)

Hearing this shabad, Babar called Guru Ji and asked him to sing it again. Guru Ji sang it again. Babur said, "Friends, he is a nice 'Faqeer' (Holy man)." Then, he offered 'Bhang' to Guru Ji and said, "O Saint, eat the 'Bhang'."

However, Guru Ji replied, "Meer Ji, I have eaten the Bhang, whose stimulation never ends". Babur asked, "Which is the Bhang, whose stimulation never ends?"

Guru Ji asked Baba Mardaana Ji to play on 'Rabaab'. Guru Ji recited this shabad: -

  tilang mehlaa 1, ghar 2, ik ounkaar satgur prasaad. 
  bhau teraa bhaang, khalrree meraa cheet. mai devaanaa bheiaa ateet. 
  kar kaasaa darsan kee bhookh. mai dar maangau neetaa neet.1. 
  tau darsan kee karau samaae. mai dar maangat bheekiaa paae.1.rahaao. 
  kesar kusam mirgamai harnnaa sarab sareeree charrnnaa. chandan bhagtaa
jot enehee, sarbe parmal karnnaa.2.
ghia patt bhaanddaa kehai na koe. aisaa bhagat varan mehi hoe. terai naam nive rehe liv laae. naanak tin dar bheekiaa paae.3.1.2.' “Tilang, First Mehl, Second House: One Universal Creator God. By The Grace Of The True Guru: The Fear of You, O Lord Vaheguru, is my marijuana (cannabis); my consciousness is the pouch, which holds it. I have become an intoxicated hermit. My hands are my begging bowl; I am so hungry for the Blessed Vision of Your Darshan. I beg at Your Door, day after day. ||1|| I long for the Blessed Vision of Your Darshan. I am a beggar at Your Door - please bless me with Your charity. ||1||Pause|| Saffron, flowers, musk oil and gold embellish the bodies of all. The Lord's devotees are like sandalwood, which imparts its fragrance to everyone. ||2|| No one says that ghee or silk are polluted. Such is the Lord's devotee, no matter what his social status is. Those who bow in reverence to the Naam, the Name of Vaheguru, remain absorbed in Your Love. Nanak begs for charity at their door. ||3||1||2||” (Ang 721, SGGS)


Guru Ji clearly says that ‘Bhau Tera Bhaang’, meaning 'The Fear of You, Vaheguru, is my marijuana (cannabis)'. Thus, Vaheguru's Fear is the true 'Bhang' for a Sikh. Reading this holy shabad, how can we say that Guru Ji accepts ‘Bhang' and that he has not condemned it? If Guru Ji was pleased when Babur offered 'Bhang' to him, why did Guru Sahib not drink it? 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala' does not state that Guru Ji drank 'Bhang'.


Then, according to 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala', King Babur offered land to Guru Ji, but Guru Ji refused again. Babur requested Guru Ji to have mercy on him. Hearing this, Guru Ji asked him to release innocent prisoners. Babur requested for a boon of kingdom for his generations. Guru Ji granted him the boon. Babur released the prisoners and gave them cloths. On this, according to 'Janamsakhi Bhai Bala', "Taan Baba Ji Barhe Prasann Hoye" (At that time, Baba Ji was so pleased).


Therefore, we see that neither Guru Ji accepted 'Bhang', which was offered to him, nor he was pleased on this. Guru Ji did not accept it, because he was against its use, it is obvious. In its place, Guru Ji was happy, when Babur released the prisoners.


According to the second argument given by Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji, the 'Mahant' (abbot) of Gurusar Satlaani got a license for 'Sukhnidhaan' from the British government of that time.


A 'Mahant', even if he has many devotees, cannot be an ideal for Sikhs, who prays for the victory of invaders against his own brothers/fellow-countrymen. Also, how can it prove that the 'Maryada' of offering 'Bhang' at Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji is an old ('Puraatan') tradition just because some 'Mahant' got a license for 'Bhang' from the British government?


The third argument given by Singh Sahib Ji says that at Sri Amritsar Sahib, Tarantaaran Sahib, Sri Anandpur Sahib, 'Sukhnidhaan' is being offered.


It is possible that when Singh Sahib Ji visited Sri Amritsar Sahib Ji, 'Sukhnidhaan' was being prepared there. However, it still does not prove anything. If something is happening in modern age, how does it prove that it was in practice even Guru Gobind Singh Ji's time? Recently, a Gurdwara was in the news, where the Police found opium being cultivated. Does this prove that cultivating opium in Gurdwara premises is a 'Puraatan Maryada' (old tradition)?


The next argument given by Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji says that 'Nihangs' of the 'Budhha Dal' offer 'Sukhnidhaan'.


If some Nihangs of Budhha Dal use 'Sukhnidhaan', it does not prove that it is a 'Maryada' started by Guru Gobind Singh Ji. According to the book 'Twaareekh Guru Khalsa', written by Giani Gian Singh, the Budhha Dal was founded in Samvat 1791 Bikrami (1734 CE). (See, 'Twaareekh Guru Khalsa', part second, page 119, year 1987, the Language Department, Punjab). Any 'Maryada', which is being practiced presently in an organisation, which was founded many years after Guru Gobind Singh Ji left for his heavenly abode, does not prove that it is an old tradition from the Guru’s times.


For example, nowadays, Budhha Dal has started to install 'Sri Sarab-loh Granth' along with Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji and Sri Dasam Granth. It is a well-known fact that installing Sri Sarabloh Granth alongside with Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not an old tradition. Instead, it is a completely new idea. Even Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji himself has not written that Sri Sarabloh Granth should be installed in Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji. Can anyone claim that installing Sri Sarabloh Granth is an old tradition, because at the present time it is being installed by Budhha Dal at some places?


Not only Budhha Dal', but 'Tarna Dal' also was founded in the year of 1734 CE. In addition, none of these organisations were founded by Guru Gobind Singh Ji.


In another argument, Singh Sahib Ji writes that description of 'Sukhnidhaan' has been given on many places in the book 'Sooraj Prakash' (Sri Gur Prataap Sooraj Granth).


Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji himself would not have accepted every point of the 'Sooraj Prakaash' a reliable source. For example, it is the same 'Sri Gur Prataap Sooraj Granth' (Sooraj Prakash), which does not believe that 'Raag-Mala' of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is recited by Guru Ji. It is not rational to accept one thing and reject another in 'Gur Prataap Sooraj Granth'. Only a serious analysis of many books and sources can show us the way to a result.


Giving another argument, Singh Sahib Ji wrote that At 'Shaheedi Baag' in the city of Sri Anandpur Sahib, a small room, which was constructed during the times of Guru Sahib, has been excavated, in which there were big 'Suneharas' (a kind of big vessel). It proves that 'Sukhnidhaan' was prepared and offered during the time of Guru Sahib.


A big 'Suneharas' found in an old room does not prove that only 'Sukhnidhaan' was being prepared in them. If someone finds a cauldron in an old room, how can it be said that only 'Karhaah Parshaad' (sacred pudding) was cooked in it, and not any vegetables? Even we believe that 'Sukhnidhaan' was prepared in those 'Suneharas', it is impossible to prove that this 'Sukhnidhaan' was prepared for Guru Ji, or by his permission.


Singh Sahib Ji wrote that according to 'Khalsa Dharam Shaastar', Guru Gobind Singh Ji ordered to take intoxicants to remove sadness. The quantity of 'Chhatar-dhara' (opium) and 'Sukhnidhaan' was fixed.


First, the 'Khalsa Dharam Shastar' is not an old book. Therefore, the tradition of 'Sukhnidhaan' cannot be proved an old tradition by this book. If we accept the argument of 'Chhatardhara' and 'Sukhnidhaan' given by the 'Khalsa Dharam Shastar', then why is only 'Sukhnidhaan' being offered at Takht Sachkhand Sri Hazoor Sahib Ji? Why don’t they offer 'Chhatardhara' (opium)? There is description of opium and marijuana in a same line. One is being offered at Takht Sahib Ji, and another is not. Why is it so?


Singh Sahib Ji wrote that all the 'Rehats' could be known only from the Guru’s history and 'Rehatnamas'. We cannot know 'Rehats' from Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji.


Though it is right that we obtain information about all the 'Rehats' from the Guru’s history and 'Rehatnamas’, but only one book of history or only a single 'Rehatnama' cannot be accepted as an authority. We know that the present 'Maryada' of an 'Amrit Sanchaar' (Sikh initiation ceremony) is not written in any of old 'Rehatnamas'; even then, the present 'Maryada' of an 'Amrit Sanchaar’ is being followed across the world. Why is it so? Does it not indicate that we obtain the 'Sikhi Rehat' from an unbroken tradition, which was started by Satguru Kalgeedhaar, the tenth Guru?


It is obvious from arguments given by Singh Sahib Bhai Joginder Singh Ji that he used the terms 'Bhang' and 'Sukhnidhaan' as synonymous with each other. Being the “head priest” of Takht Sahib Ji, he must have read these lines of Gurbaani: -

  ‘kabeer bhaang maachhulee suraa paan jo jo praanee khaa(n)hi. 
  teerat barat nem kee-e te sabhe rsaatal jaa(n).233.’
  “O Kabeer! If people after ‘speaking with the Holy’ and go on pilgrimages,
    perform fasts and practice rituals etc, 
  and those sharaabi, intoxicated, people also consume marijuana and fish 
  (i.e. they attend the Satsang and also consume Sharaab-Kebab and commit immoral deeds) 
  – those persons pilgrimages, fasts and rituals are totally useless. ||233||” 
  (Ang 1377, SGGS) 


I do not know why Singh Sahib Ji did not consider it necessary to mention these lines when he was discussing such an important topic.


http://www.amritworld.com/bhang.html

Shabads connected with marijuana

SGGS Page 1377 Full Shabad

ਕਬੀਰ ਭਾਂਗ ਮਾਛ੝ਲੀ ਸ੝ਰਾ ਪਾਨਿ ਜੋ ਜੋ ਪ੝ਰਾਨੀ ਖਾਂਹਿ ॥
kabeer bhaaNg maachhulee suraa paan jo jo paraanee khaaNhi.
Kabeer, those mortals who consume marijuana, fish and wine

ਤੀਰਥ ਬਰਤ ਨੇਮ ਕੀਝ ਤੇ ਸਭੈ ਰਸਾਤਲਿ ਜਾਂਹਿ ॥੨੩੩॥
tirath barat naym kee-ay tay sabhai rasaatal jaaNhi. ॥233॥
- no matter what pilgrimages, fasts and rituals they follow, they will all go to hell. ॥233॥