Bachitar Natak: Writing of Guru Gobind Singh?

From SikhiWiki
Revision as of 23:03, 27 December 2009 by Hpt lucky (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Acc. to some people, poet tried to impersonate Guru Ji by showing his father died for Hinduism, that he fought Bhangani Battle, Nadaun battle etc, but left many clues which show that the writer cannot be Guru Gobind Singh.

Ideological mistakes

  • His father visited many pilgrimages, which is against Sikhism and shows that Guru Tegh Bahadur couldn't be his father.
    • Visiting Pilgrimages is not against sikhism at all. But the aim behind visiting pilgrimages like someone want to attain moksha through pilgrimage, or someone bath in water to get pure these beliefs are false. Gurus said god is within us, but if someone visit pilgrimages for darshan it doesn't means that he become non sikh.
      If you visit Golden Temple isn't it pilgrimage? If you visit Sees Ganj Sahib isn't it pilgrimage? But if you think by Visiting Hazoor Sahib you will attain lord then its against sikhi. Golden Temple and Hazoor Sahib is not related to Attaining God. The Gurbani is way to understand god and the Dasam Bani is way to undrstand gurmat, reach there and understand him.
      In Bacchitar Natak it is mentioned that poets father visited pilgrimages (like Guru Nanak did, Guru Tegh Bahadur did). What poets father did there? Read Bachitar Natak for it.
  • Says all prophets before him are fake. Poet tried to break communal Harmony.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਭਝ ਪਹਿਲ ਅਵਤਾਰਾ ॥ ਆਪ੝ ਆਪ੝ ਤਿਨ ਜਾਪ੝ ਉਚਾਰਾ ॥
All the earlier incarnations caused only their names to be remembered.

ਪ੝ਰਭ ਦੋਖੀ ਕੋਈ ਨ ਬਿਦਾਰਾ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਕਰਨ ਕੋ ਰਾਹ੝ ਨ ਡਾਰਾ ॥੪੪॥
They did not strike the tyrants and did not make them follow th path of Dharma.44.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਗਉਸ ਅੰਬੀਆ ਭਝ ॥ ਮੈ ਮੈ ਕਰਤ ਜਗਤ ਤੇ ਗਝ ॥
All the earlier prophets ended themselves in ego.

ਮਹਾਪ੝ਰਖ ਕਾਹੂੰ ਨ ਪਛਾਨਾ ॥ ਕਰਮ ਧਰਮ ਕੋ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਜਾਨਾ ॥੪੫॥
And did not comprehend the supreme Purusha, they did not care for the righteous actions.45.

    • These lines is about Avtarwaad like Rama, Krishna, Varah etc, not related to sikhism. Prophets are paigambars and this word is not related to sikhism.
      We have word Gurmukh. Prophets are related to christianity and islam Jesus, Muhammad, Noah etc.
      In Bachitar natak poet clearly mentioned role of 9 Nanaks in spreading god words and he himself did so. 9 gurus were not avtars and not paigambars.
      Poet is not against 9 Nanaks if it is so he must mentioned their name in list of ((Trideva, Bairagis, Jogis, Prophet Followers)). Acc. to poet God is against the way made by Trideva, Muhamad, Ramanand, Gorakh, but he havent mentioned sikhi or gurmat. It is upto Shitaan mind what he thinks. but Pet tried to break communal harmony.

Chronological mistakes

  • The poet makes many mistakes, such as placing Ramanand in history before Muhammad, saying that first three Gurus were Bedis, while second Guru was Trehan and third was Bhalla.
    • Ramanand Birth place and birth duration and birth date is vague and what's problem. The Central Idea of that lines were to break comunal harmony by saying that all died in ego. but not Panth of Guru Nanak. and what is problem if they born in bedis. They rejected casteism like Poet Shyam said manas ki jaat sabey eke pehchanbo.