Bachitar Natak: Writing of Guru Gobind Singh?: Difference between revisions

From SikhiWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==Ideological mistakes==
==Ideological mistakes==


* His father visited many pilgrimages, which is against Sikhism and his father bring him to punjab.
* His father visited many pilgrimages, which is against Sikhism and shows that Guru Tegh Bahadur couldn't be his father.


* Says all prophets before him are fake.
* Says all prophets before him are fake.

Revision as of 18:13, 27 December 2009

The poet tried to impersonate Guru Ji by showing his father died for Hinduism, that he fought Bhangani Battle, Nadaun battle etc, but left many clues which show that the writer cannot be Guru Gobind Singh.

Ideological mistakes

  • His father visited many pilgrimages, which is against Sikhism and shows that Guru Tegh Bahadur couldn't be his father.
  • Says all prophets before him are fake.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਭਝ ਪਹਿਲ ਅਵਤਾਰਾ ॥ ਆਪ੝ ਆਪ੝ ਤਿਨ ਜਾਪ੝ ਉਚਾਰਾ ॥ All the earlier incarnations caused only their names to be remembered.

ਪ੝ਰਭ ਦੋਖੀ ਕੋਈ ਨ ਬਿਦਾਰਾ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਕਰਨ ਕੋ ਰਾਹ੝ ਨ ਡਾਰਾ ॥੪੪॥ They did not strike the tyrants and did not make them follow th path of Dharma.44.

ਜੇ ਜੇ ਗਉਸ ਅੰਬੀਆ ਭਝ ॥ ਮੈ ਮੈ ਕਰਤ ਜਗਤ ਤੇ ਗਝ ॥ All the earlier prophets ended themselves in ego.

ਮਹਾਪ੝ਰਖ ਕਾਹੂੰ ਨ ਪਛਾਨਾ ॥ ਕਰਮ ਧਰਮ ਕੋ ਕਛੂ ਨ ਜਾਨਾ ॥੪੫॥ And did not comprehend the supreme Purusha, they did not care for the righteous actions.45.

Chronological mistakes

  • The poet makes many mistakes, such as placing Ramanand in history before Muhammad, saying that first three Gurus were Bedis, while second Guru was Trehan and third was Bhalla.